质量管理视阈下思想政治教育决策研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 17:15

本文选题：质量管理 + 思想政治教育　；参考：《桂林理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近些年党和国家越来越重视思想政治教育质量问题,多次以不同形式要求不断提升思想政治教育质量。思想政治教育决策是思想政治教育的起始环节和重要组成部分,提高思想政治教育决策质量是提升思想政治教育质量的首要任务和重要保障。思想政治教育决策是思想政治教育决策者为了快速达成预定的目标、及时解决存在的问题或有效预防不利因素的发生,采用一定的理论和方法对思想政治教育决策信息进行分析、判断后制订若干个方案,并对这些方案进行评估后从中选择最佳的一个或一组方案进行实施完善的过程。针对当前思想政治教育决策中存在的一些问题,包括决策者自身素质不过硬、决策目标笼统不具体、决策方案时效性不强、决策监督反馈制度和决策问责制度有待完善和决策方法创新性有待提高等。本论文在借鉴质量管理相关理论和方法的基础上,采用案例论证法、逻辑演绎法和文献综述法等研究方法就影响思想政治教育决策质量的要素进行了分析和论证。提出为了不断提高思想政治教育决策质量必须要优化决策者结构、规范决策程序、完善决策制度和创新决策方法的观点。文章主要分为以下四个章节:第一章主要介绍了选题来源、研究意义、国内外研究综述、研究思路与方法和研究创新点。第二章主要介绍思想政治教育决策质量的定义和内涵以及研究的理论依据。第三章主要是利用大学生抵制日货游行、药家鑫事件、延安整风运动和向雷锋同志学习活动四个案例分析论证影响思想政治教育决策质量的要素。第四章主要是从优化决策者结构、规范决策程序、完善决策制度和创新决策方法四个方面提升思想政治教育决策质量。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the Party and government pay more and more attention to the quality of ideological and political education, and constantly improve the quality of ideological and political education in different forms. The decision-making of ideological and political education is the starting link and an important part of ideological and political education. Improving the quality of decision-making of ideological and political education is the primary task and important guarantee to improve the quality of ideological and political education. The decision making of ideological and political education refers to the decision makers of ideological and political education to solve the existing problems or effectively prevent the occurrence of unfavorable factors in order to reach the predetermined goal quickly. The decision information of ideological and political education is analyzed by using certain theories and methods, and several schemes are made after judgment, and the best one or a group of schemes is selected to carry out the perfect process after the evaluation of these schemes. In view of the problems existing in the current decision-making of ideological and political education, including the poor quality of the decision makers themselves, the general and unspecific objectives of the decision making, the lack of timeliness of the decision-making schemes, The decision-making supervision feedback system and decision-making accountability system need to be improved and the innovation of decision methods need to be improved. Based on the relevant theories and methods of quality management, this paper analyzes and demonstrates the factors that affect the quality of ideological and political education decision-making by the methods of case study, logical deduction and literature review. In order to improve the quality of decision making in ideological and political education, it is necessary to optimize the structure of decision makers, standardize the decision-making procedure, perfect the decision-making system and innovate the decision-making methods in order to improve the decision quality of ideological and political education. The article is divided into the following four chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the source of the topic, research significance, domestic and foreign research review, research ideas and methods and research innovation. The second chapter mainly introduces the definition and connotation of decision-making quality of ideological and political education and the theoretical basis of the research. The third chapter mainly uses the college students to boycott the Japanese goods march, the Yao Jiaxin event, the Yan'an rectification movement and the study activity from Comrade Lei Feng four case analysis demonstration influence ideological and political education decision-making quality factor. The fourth chapter is to improve the quality of ideological and political education decision-making from four aspects: optimizing the structure of decision makers, standardizing decision-making procedures, perfecting the decision-making system and innovating decision-making methods.
【学位授予单位】：桂林理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G641

【参考文献】