分裂的校园:1920—1927年东南大学治理结构的演变

发布时间：2018-05-29 08:39

本文选题：东南大学 + 治理结构　；参考：《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：1920—1927年东南大学的治理结构经历了显著变化,其中以评议会和校董会的权力消长为核心。作为全校最高议事机关的评议会,面对校内系科之争,因利益关涉难有效能,其职权被校董会逐步挤压,最终在1923年被全面取代。校董会体现了东南大学在地方构建一个沟通政、商、学界权势网络的努力,也成为东大汲取社会资源的重要渠道。校董会职权的扩展,不仅加剧了校内群体的分裂,也强化了大学对于地方军政势力的依赖,从而带来潜在的政治风险。校内的分裂与校外的政治因素相互激荡,终成为1925年易长风潮的重要推手。在易长之后大学权力格局的重组中,"教授治校"的理念被高举,并形成了"教授会议—校务会"的双层结构。但面对风云变幻的政治局势,所谓的"教授治校",在校务管理上鲜有效能,也难以应对激变的时代。
[Abstract]:In 1920-1927, the governance structure of Southeast University underwent significant changes, with the power of the Senate and Council as the core. As the highest deliberative organ of the whole school, in the face of the disputes between departments and departments in the school, its functions and powers were gradually squeezed by the council because of the difficulty and effectiveness of the interests involved, and finally replaced by the board of trustees in 1923. The council reflects the efforts of Southeast University to build a network of political, business and academic power in the local area, and has also become an important channel for Dongda to absorb social resources. The expansion of the power of the council not only intensifies the division of groups in the school, but also strengthens the dependence of the university on the local military and political forces, thus bringing about potential political risks. The division of the school and the political factors outside the school became the important driving force of the long trend in 1925. In the reorganization of university power pattern after Yi Chang, the idea of "professor governing school" was held high, and formed the double layer structure of "professor conference". However, in the face of the changing political situation, the so-called "professor administration of school", school management is rarely effective, but also difficult to cope with the era of upheaval.
【作者单位】：南京大学校史研究室;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基地重大项目“国家建构与大学治理——民国时期的大学与国家关系研究”(11JJD770027)
【分类号】：G649.28;K26

【相似文献】