高校学术不端行为治理政策效能的演变特征

发布时间：2018-06-19 22:24

本文选题：高校 + 学术不端　；参考：《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：以2002—2016年教育部颁布治理高校学术不端行为政策为对象,结合1991—2016年中国高校师生发生的43个典型案例,基于政策内容及其与实践互动视角,以学术不端行为界定,学术规范与学术道德教育,学术不端行为披露、调查、处理和反馈为分析链条,以教育部"高校学风建设专项教育和治理行动"为关键节点,将政策按时间分为2012年以前、2012—2014年、2014年至今三个阶段,对政策效能演变分析发现:学术不端行为界定的边界不断清晰且可识别性增强;学术规范与学术道德教育制度要求持续增强且具有可操作性的细则;学术不端行为披露制度规范性要求增强并激励高校积极受理举报;学术不端行为调查制度形成了高校调查过程透明性持续增强的细则;学术不端行为处理制度对处理力度与过程公正性的要求不断加强;学术不端行为反馈制度形成了信息共享透明、责任主体强约束的做法。
[Abstract]:Taking the policy of governing academic misconduct issued by the Ministry of Education from 2002 to 2016 as the object, combined with 43 typical cases of college teachers and students in China from 1991 to 2016, this paper defines academic misconduct from the perspective of policy content and its interaction with practice. Academic norms and academic moral education, disclosure of academic misconduct, investigation, processing and feedback are the analysis chain, with the Ministry of Education as the key node of "Special Education and Governance Action for the Construction of the style of study in Colleges and Universities". The policy is divided into three stages from 2012 to 2014, and from 2014 to present. The analysis of the evolution of policy effectiveness shows that: the boundaries of academic misconduct are increasingly clear and identifiable; Academic norms and academic moral education system require continuous enhancement and maneuverability of detailed rules, academic misconduct disclosure system normative requirements to strengthen and encourage colleges and universities to actively accept reports; The investigation system of academic misconduct has formed the rules for the continuous enhancement of transparency in the investigation process of colleges and universities, and the requirements of the handling system of academic misconduct for the intensity of handling and the fairness of the process are constantly strengthened. The system of academic misconduct feedback forms the practice of transparent information sharing and strong restraint of the responsible subject.
【作者单位】：西安交通大学管理学院;
【分类号】：G644

【相似文献】