晚清时期的外人办学与教育主权
发布时间：2018-07-24 13:31
【摘要】：晚清政府对待外国人在华办学的基本态度是"无庸立案,不给奖励。"学界对此政策主要有四种解读:或强调列强无视中国教育主权,或猜测清政府为了维护教育主权,或认为清政府不知教育主权可贵,或批评清政府出卖教育主权。其实外国人在中国内地办学,大都愿意承认中国教育主权;而列强在其势力范围内办学,则往往干涉、侵犯中国教育主权。晚清时期民间与官方均对国家教育主权有清醒的认识,且采取相应措施来维护。民间主要通过翻译评论国外有关教育主权的文章、报道外国对于中国教育主权的侵害、成立相应的机构来维护。官方则针对外人办学的具体情况分别采取限权、收权、留权等方式来维护。
[Abstract]:The basic attitude of the late Qing government towards foreigners running schools in China was "No case, no reward." There are mainly four interpretations of this policy in academic circles: either emphasizing that the great powers ignore China's educational sovereignty, or speculating that the Qing government did not know the value of educational sovereignty in order to safeguard education sovereignty, or criticizing the Qing government for selling out its educational sovereignty. In fact, most foreigners who run schools in the mainland of China are willing to recognize China's sovereignty over education, while foreign powers often interfere in running schools within their sphere of influence, infringing upon China's sovereignty over education. In the late Qing Dynasty, both civil and government had a clear understanding of national education sovereignty and took corresponding measures to maintain it. The folk mainly report the infringement of China's educational sovereignty by translating and commenting on foreign articles on education sovereignty, and set up corresponding institutions to safeguard it. On the other hand, according to the specific conditions of outsiders, the government adopts the methods of restriction, repossession, retention and so on.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学教育学院;
【基金】：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2014SJB539)
【分类号】：G649.29
本文编号：2141537
[Abstract]:The basic attitude of the late Qing government towards foreigners running schools in China was "No case, no reward." There are mainly four interpretations of this policy in academic circles: either emphasizing that the great powers ignore China's educational sovereignty, or speculating that the Qing government did not know the value of educational sovereignty in order to safeguard education sovereignty, or criticizing the Qing government for selling out its educational sovereignty. In fact, most foreigners who run schools in the mainland of China are willing to recognize China's sovereignty over education, while foreign powers often interfere in running schools within their sphere of influence, infringing upon China's sovereignty over education. In the late Qing Dynasty, both civil and government had a clear understanding of national education sovereignty and took corresponding measures to maintain it. The folk mainly report the infringement of China's educational sovereignty by translating and commenting on foreign articles on education sovereignty, and set up corresponding institutions to safeguard it. On the other hand, according to the specific conditions of outsiders, the government adopts the methods of restriction, repossession, retention and so on.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学教育学院;
【基金】：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2014SJB539)
【分类号】：G649.29
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 张卫国;;跨国高等教育背景下教育主权新论[J];国家教育行政学院学报;2011年05期
2 田海;;高等教育服务贸易视角下中国教育主权的让渡与维护[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
3 刁泓琳;杨臻臻;;清华MOOC诞生记——开放式教学冲击传统全球化竞争呼唤教育主权[J];大学生;2014年Z1期
4 王楠;;外资大学的风险及收益研究[J];湖北第二师范学院学报;2008年06期
5 茹宗志;;中国设立外资大学的构想[J];学术论坛;2007年04期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 解艳华;拥抱世界 教育主权不能丢[N];人民政协报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨颖;高等教育国际化背景下教育主权问题研究[D];云南师范大学;2005年
，本文编号：2141537
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/2141537.html
