我国与英美两国高等教育专业评估的比较研究

发布时间：2018-08-07 13:15

【摘要】：随着经济发展和社会进步,高等教育质量问题成为社会关注热点问题。专业是高校人才培养的直接单位,专业的建设水平在很大程度上决定了高校能否培养出高质量的人才。对专业进行评估成为促进高等教育质量水平不断提高的重要手段。但是综观我国高等教育评估的发展历程,高等教育评估更加侧重于院校评估,而专业评估则发展有限。本研究以高等教育专业评估为研究对象,希望引发更多学者对专业评估的关注,促进专业评估繁荣发展,同时在一定程度上为促进我国高等教育评估理论体系的完善提供一定参考,促进学校专业与人才培养结构的调整与优化,提高学校整体的教学工作水平,促进我国高等教育的国际化,实现与国际高等教育质量实质等效,具有重要的理论与实践意义。按照“发现问题、分析问题、解决问题”的思路,通过收集、整理和分析资料,找出我国现阶段专业评估工作中存在的问题并分析原因;在梳理了中英美三国专业评估发展历程的基础上,分别从评估程序、教育评估机构、政府在评估中扮演的角色三方面对三个国家的专业评估进行了比较研究,总结归纳英美两国专业评估对我国的启示;最后结合我国专业评估存在问题与英美两国专业评估经验,从政府、社会、高校三个层面提出完善我国的高等教育专业评估的对策。
[Abstract]:With economic development and social progress, the quality of higher education has become a hot issue of social concern. Specialty is the direct unit of talent training in colleges and universities. The level of specialty construction determines to a great extent whether colleges and universities can cultivate high quality talents. Professional evaluation has become an important means to improve the quality of higher education. However, in view of the development of higher education evaluation in China, higher education evaluation is more focused on college evaluation, while professional evaluation has limited development. This research takes the higher education professional evaluation as the research object, hoping to arouse more scholars' attention to the professional evaluation, and promote the professional evaluation to flourish and develop. At the same time, to a certain extent, it provides some references for the improvement of the theoretical system of higher education evaluation in our country, promotes the adjustment and optimization of the structure of professional and talent training in schools, and improves the teaching work level of the whole school. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to promote the internationalization of higher education in China and realize the substantial equivalence with the quality of international higher education. According to the idea of "finding problems, analyzing problems and solving problems", through collecting, sorting out and analyzing the data, we can find out the existing problems and analyze the causes of the professional evaluation work in our country at the present stage. On the basis of combing the development course of professional evaluation in China and the United States, this paper makes a comparative study on the professional evaluation of the three countries from three aspects: the evaluation procedure, the educational evaluation institution and the role played by the government in the evaluation. Finally, combining the problems existing in the professional evaluation of our country and the experience of the professional evaluation of the United States and the United States, the author puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the professional evaluation of higher education in our country from three aspects: government, society and universities.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G642.3

【参考文献】