当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 房地产论文 >

商品房买卖合同纠纷典型案例评析

发布时间:2018-01-14 04:31

  本文关键词:商品房买卖合同纠纷典型案例评析 出处:《湖南大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 商品房买卖 法律适用 房地产法 物权法


【摘要】:随着我国商品房市场的深入发展,商品房买卖成为社会普遍关注的热点,而在商品房买卖过程中因此发生的纠纷也越来越多。由于房地产市场领域相关法律法规的不健全,在司法实践中对于法律适用层面产生许多困惑和不解,给交易各方的利益保护缺乏统一的裁判尺度,同一类型的纠纷在不同地方不同法院会出现不同处理结果,甚至作出完全相反的判决,引发司法裁判的混乱局面。基于商品房建设和销售的特殊性,买受人与开发商之间的纠纷往往在同一个房地产项目具有群体性特点,而买受人通常也会采取集体维权方式与开发商进行交涉,给社会稳定带来很大隐患。通过对常见的商品房买卖合同纠纷典型案例进行分析,我们会发现,单论单个买受人与开发商之间的纷争,法律关系看似简单,但实际上个案背后通常都会涉及到众多买受人和巨大利益,买受人据理力争,开发商不容有失,双方之间在法律适用上展开充分博弈。博弈背后折射的是我国商品房买卖法律保护制度的立法不足,迫切需要尽早实现房地产法在立法方面的加强与完善。我国目前的房地产法的立法依据主要出自《宪法》、《民法通则》、《土地管理法》、《城市房地产管理法》等相关适用法律法规,同时,,众多的部门规章和地方立法也参与了房地产法的立法体系的构建。现行的房地产立法章程和体系十分庞杂而且难以避免冲突和重叠现场的出现,较为浓厚的行政管理法色彩被附着在了立法取向之上,因此使得民事权利受到了行政管理权力的过多干涉,房地产权人的应有权利也就“顺理成章”地发生了萎缩和弱化。我国的房地产和不动产及其交易市场的形成虽然会因为这种附着浓厚管理色彩的立法制度及其立法成果而受益,但是我国的房地产市场正在社会主义市场经济体制日益完善的大背景下逐步趋向规范,大量的商品房和商用楼不断涌现。因而,我国的房地产法将不得不实现其功能的转变,继而由原先的管理功能转变为服务功能,意即保护房地产权人的合法权利,调整平等交易的买卖主体之间的利益关系。由此就会引发房地产法在立法的思路、理论基础、指导思想等方面的变化,而这种变化又是对现行房地产法过渡性的充分彰显。
[Abstract]:With the further development of China's real estate market, the sale of commercial housing has become the focus of society, and in the process of real estate transactions in the disputes are more and more. Because of the real estate market related laws and regulations are not perfect, in the judicial practice in the application of the law have many confused and puzzled, to protect the interests of the parties to the transaction, the lack of unified referee scale, the same types of disputes will lead to different results in different places and different courts, and even make the opposite decision, causing judicial confusion. Based on the particularity of commercial housing construction and sales, the buyer between people and developers disputes often in the same room real estate project has the community characteristics, and the buyer will usually take the collective rights of way and developers to negotiate, bring great hidden trouble to the common social stability. Analysis of commercial housing disputes typical case, we will find that on the single single buyer between people and developers disputes, legal relationship may seem simple, but in fact behind the case usually involves many buyers and great interest, the buyer argued, developers must not be lost, between the two sides in the law the application on the full game. The game behind the refraction is China's lack of legal protection for the sale of commercial housing system legislation, there is an urgent need to strengthen and improve the real estate law as soon as possible to achieve in terms of legislation. The legislation on the basis of the current real estate law mainly from < < > > the constitution, civil law, land management law ">, < > City real estate management law and other related applicable laws and regulations, at the same time, the construction of legislation system of many regulations and local legislation are also involved in real estate law. The current real estate regulation and legislation system is Complex and hard to avoid conflicts and overlapping field, relatively strong administrative law color is attached to the orientation in legislation, thus making civil rights by the administrative power too much interference, the rights of property owners are also "logical" atrophic and the weakening of the real estate of our country. And the formation of real estate market and although because this is attached to the legislative system and legislative achievements of strong color management benefit, but in the background of China's real estate market is a socialist market economy system is being perfected gradually under standard, a large number of commercial housing and commercial buildings continue to emerge. Therefore, changes in the real estate law China will have to realize its function, and then from the original management function into the service function, which means the protection of property rights of the legitimate rights, equal pay adjustment The interest relationship between the business owners of Yi will lead to changes in the legislation, theoretical basis and guiding ideology of the real estate law, and this change is a full manifestation of the transitional nature of the existing real estate law.

【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.29

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王金根;;论不动产善意取得——兼论《中国民法草案物权编》的完善[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期

2 邹清明;商品房预售合同的效力研究[J];当代法学;2003年02期

3 张明;不动产登记簿的功能和效力[J];大连理工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期

4 许晶;不动产预告登记制度研究[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期

5 徐洁;“一房二卖”现象的法律防范[J];法学;2003年01期

6 李春海;;商品房买卖与《消法》的适用[J];法学天地;2001年03期

7 唐正荣;商品房预售合同若干法律问题探析[J];广西社会科学;2004年06期

8 吴舒昕;论商品房预售合同的效力[J];建筑管理现代化;2004年05期

9 王智;;浅谈我国商品房预售合同备案登记制度的完善[J];经济师;2006年02期

10 周大仓;论商品房预购人利益的法律保护[J];经济与社会发展;2005年07期



本文编号:1422071

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/1422071.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d3904***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com