金融调控权的构造及其边界
发布时间:2018-04-25 00:33
本文选题:金融调控权 + 构造 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:中国人民银行是我国的中央银行,是我国享有金融调控权的主体,它在国务院领导下行使金融调控权。随着我国市场经济的不断发展,尤其是近几年金融调控权在应对金融危机、房地产泡沫以及通货膨胀等问题中发挥了重要的作用。金融调控权的过分集中,势必会造成权力的滥用,同时会滋生腐败,也将产生一系列严重的社会问题。因此,把金融调控权纳入到法律规制的框架是必要的。 如果把权力看成一种自由,那么自由到了一定边界,就要对秩序做出衡量,自由和秩序平衡的结果就意味着有了实现正义的可能性,所以,金融调控权应该受到限制。为此《中国人民银行法》赋予中国人民银行以金融调控权,即货币政策制定和执行权,中国人民银行选择运用各种货币政策工具调节和控制货币供应量,,以维护金融稳定,保持经济健康持续发展。然而在《中国人民银行法》中却很少发现对金融调控权主体滥用权力所应承担不利后果的相关规定。金融调控权作为一种公权力本身就具有强大的社会力量,在立法上理应有所倾斜,这种偏向保障权力而较少规定权力行使所应承担的不利的法律后果也有违现代法治通过限制国家权力从而保障公民权利的精神。 本文将从四个部分阐述金融调控权的构造及其边界: 第一部分从金融调控权的一般理论出发,阐述金融调控权的构造,主要从金融调控权的主体、内容、特征的角度静态分析金融调控权。 第二部分是从根源上分析金融调控权产生,说明金融调控权不是从来就有的,也不是伴随着货币的产生而产生,而是商品经济发展到一定阶段的产物。第二次世界大战结束后,东欧剧变,苏联解体,新科技革命等,世界朝着多极化发展,逐渐形成一个统一的市场,金融调控权理论的发展也应随经济基础的变化而做出与之相适应的调整。 第三部分从动态的角度分析金融调控权的运行,金融调控权的运行是一个从货币政策目标制定、货币政策制定与执行的过程。要建立和维护金融调控权的政策运行,必须运用法律对金融调控权从程序加以限制,将金融调控权控制在法律允许的范围内。 第四部分为金融调控权的约束机制,建立起统一完备金融调控权约束机制能有效防止金融调控权的滥用、防止腐败的发生。金融调控权的约束主要有以法律制约金融调控权、以道德制约金融调控权、以权力制约金融调控权和以权利制约金融调控权四个约束机制,这四种约束机制能够更好地起到探求金融调控权的构造和边界的作用,它们之间不是相互孤立,而是一个相互补充的整体。
[Abstract]:The people's Bank of China is the central bank of our country and the main body of financial control power in our country. It exercises the financial control power under the leadership of the State Council. With the development of market economy in our country, especially in recent years, financial control power has played an important role in dealing with financial crisis, real estate bubble and inflation. The excessive concentration of financial control power will inevitably lead to abuse of power, corruption and a series of serious social problems. Therefore, it is necessary to bring financial control right into the framework of legal regulation. If we regard power as a kind of freedom, then when we reach a certain boundary, we must measure the order. The result of the balance of freedom and order means that there is the possibility to realize justice, so the financial control power should be restricted. For this reason, the people's Bank of China has given the people's Bank of China the right to control financial affairs, that is, the power to formulate and execute monetary policy. The people's Bank of China has chosen to use various monetary policy instruments to regulate and control the money supply in order to maintain financial stability. Maintain healthy and sustained economic development. However, in the Law of the people's Bank of China, there are few provisions about the negative consequences to the abusing power of the subject of financial regulation and control. As a kind of public power, the right of financial control has a strong social force, and it should be inclined in legislation. This tendency to protect power and less to stipulate the adverse legal consequences which should be borne by the exercise of power also runs counter to the spirit of modern rule of law by restricting the power of the state so as to protect the rights of citizens. This paper will elaborate the construction and boundary of financial control power from four parts: In the first part, from the general theory of financial control power, the paper expounds the structure of financial control power, mainly from the main body, content and characteristics of the financial control power static analysis of the financial control power. The second part is to analyze the origin of financial control power, which shows that financial control power does not always exist, nor does it come into being with the production of money, but the product of commodity economy development to a certain stage. After the end of the second World War, with the dramatic changes in Eastern Europe, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the new technological revolution, and so on, the world developed towards multipolarization and gradually formed a unified market. The development of the theory of financial control power should be adjusted with the change of economic base. The third part analyzes the operation of the financial control power from the dynamic point of view. The operation of the financial control power is a process from the monetary policy target formulation, the monetary policy formulation and the implementation. In order to establish and maintain the policy operation of the financial control power, we must use the law to restrict the financial control power from the procedure, and control the financial control power within the scope permitted by the law. The fourth part is the restriction mechanism of the financial control power, which can effectively prevent the abuse of the financial control power and the occurrence of corruption. The restraint of financial control power mainly includes four restraint mechanisms: restricting financial control power by law, restricting financial control right by morality, restricting financial control right by power and restricting financial control right by right. These four constraint mechanisms can play a better role in exploring the construction and boundary of financial control power. They are not isolated from each other but a complementary whole.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.281
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张守文;宏观调控权的法律解析[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年03期
2 刘志云,郑普英;刍议金融调控法体系[J];法学杂志;2002年06期
3 陈承堂;;论宏观调控权的性质[J];时代法学;2008年03期
4 李西臣;;金融宏观调控行为的经济法分析[J];经济经纬;2007年06期
5 胡光志;周昌发;;金融调控权若干问题探讨[J];经济体制改革;2009年02期
6 何志鹏;;国际法治:和谐世界的必由之路[J];清华法学;2009年01期
7 闫德民;;权力制约范式论析[J];社会科学;2009年07期
8 陈承堂;;宏观调控权是怎样生成的 基于罗斯福新政的考察[J];中外法学;2011年05期
9 李昌麒,胡光志;宏观调控法若干基本范畴的法理分析[J];中国法学;2002年02期
10 张辉;;论宏观经济调控权的构成与配置[J];政治与法律;2008年11期
本文编号:1798986
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/1798986.html