首相问答中的不礼貌言语研究

发布时间：2018-01-21 13:41

本文关键词： 不礼貌首相问答冲突性政治语篇　出处：《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：与礼貌研究相比,不礼貌研究一直没有得到足够的重视。有的学者认为不礼貌是一种边缘现象,不需要研究;有的认为BrownLevinson的礼貌理论即可解释不礼貌现象。他们对于不礼貌的研究不仅描述上不够充分,还存在概念上的偏见。事实上,冲突性话语在一些语篇中发挥着重要作用,而现有的礼貌理论并不能够充分解释这些语篇中的不礼貌现象。因此,学者们对不礼貌现象进行了专门研究,并提出了不礼貌理论模型。本研究以Bousfield(2008)不礼貌模式为理论框架,以英国首相问答为研究对象,分析冲突性政治语篇中不礼貌言语的使用,研究不礼貌策略和回应策略在语料中的体现以及功能,探讨Bousfield提出的不礼貌理论模型应用于冲突性政治语篇的可行性和可操作性,进一步丰富关于不礼貌现象的研究。本研究的主要发现有:(1)英国首相问答中的不礼貌策略包括直接性不礼貌策略和间接性不礼貌策略,直接性不礼貌策略包括侮辱、要求行动、嘲笑、批评谴责和挑战,间接性不礼貌策略包括虚假礼貌和反问;(2)首相和反对党领袖在面子受到威胁时倾向于攻击对方的面子和维护自己的面子,维护面子的方法包括转移话题、巩固积极面子、转移责任、解释和直接反驳;(3)首相问答中的不礼貌言语可以用来完成政治目的、协商政治地位。通过对首相问答中不礼貌言语的探讨,本研究进一步丰富了关于不礼貌现象的研究,有利于纠正礼貌研究与不礼貌研究之间的不平衡现状。此外,不礼貌理论也为首相问答的研究提供了新的角度,有利于加深对于冲突性政治语篇的理解。
[Abstract]:Compared with politeness research, the study of impoliteness has not been paid enough attention to. Some scholars think that impoliteness is a marginal phenomenon, which does not need to be studied. Some people think that BrownLevinson's politeness theory can explain the phenomenon of impoliteness. Conflict discourse plays an important role in some discourses, but the existing politeness theories can not fully explain the impoliteness phenomenon in these discourses. Therefore, scholars have made a special research on the phenomenon of impoliteness. A theoretical model of impoliteness is put forward. This study takes Bousfield / 2008) as the theoretical framework and takes the British Prime Minister's question and answer as the research object. This paper analyzes the use of impolite speech in conflict political discourse, and studies the embodiment and function of impoliteness strategy and response strategy in the corpus. This paper discusses the feasibility and maneuverability of applying Bousfield's impoliteness theory model to conflict political discourse. The main findings of this study are as follows: (1) the British Prime Minister's politeness strategies include direct impoliteness strategies and indirect impoliteness strategies. Direct impoliteness strategies include insults, demands for action, ridicule, criticism, condemnation and challenge, and indirect impoliteness strategies include false politeness and counter-questioning. The Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition party tend to attack each other's face and maintain their own face when face is threatened. The methods of maintaining face include shifting the topic, consolidating positive face, and shifting responsibility. Interpretation and direct refutation; 3) the impolite speech in the Prime Minister's question and answer can be used to accomplish the political purpose and negotiate the political position. Through the discussion of the impolite speech in the Prime Minister's question and answer, this study further enriches the research on the phenomenon of impoliteness. In addition, the theory of impoliteness also provides a new perspective for the study of the Prime Minister's question and answer, and helps to deepen the understanding of conflicting political discourse.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H313

【相似文献】