大学生思辨能力与英语写作能力相关性研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 12:09

本文选题：思辨模型　切入点：大学生　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本研究采用斯特拉·科特雷尔的“思辨:知识、技能和态度”问卷,从三个维度对大学生进行思辨测量,同时在相关学者的研究基础上构建起一个与思辨三个维度相一致的研究框架,作为评估大学生英语议论文中思辨技能的参照。本研究同时以大学生英语议论文作为切入点,采用思辨技能和普通评估两项评估标准分别对学生的英语议论文进行评分,考察学生英语议论文中体现出的思辨技能运用情况及其英语议论文写作水平。在此基础上,本课题对大学生思辨问卷结果、英语议论文中展现出的思辨技能运用情况及其英语议论文写作水平三者之间的相关性进行了探究。本研究中的两个研究问题如下:(1)中国大学生思辨能力及其英语议论文中思辨技能实际运用情况现状如何?(2)大学生思辨能力、其英语议论文中思辨技能实际运用情况及英语议论文写作水平之间存在何种关系?本研究的发现如下。大学生思辨问卷结果显示,超过三分之二的学生对自己的思辨(批判性思维)表现为‘有信心’,然而,仍存在将近三分之一的学生对自己的思辨缺乏信心。受试学生总体在思辨态度方面表现最好,知识和技能维度也都显示良好,但考虑受试学生来自重点大学,且其英语议论文普通评估一项显示受试者的英语议论文写作水平良好,因此,综合考量得出的结论是,受试学生的思辨能力还有很大的提高空间。本研究同时发现,大学生思辨问卷结果、相应英语议论文中展现出的思辨技能运用情况及其英语议论文写作水平三者之间的相关性为:(1)学生英语议论文写作水平与其思辨技能运用情况(议论文中)及与其思辨水平(问卷调查结果)之间均分别存在很强的正向相关关系,这表明学生的思辨技能及思辨总体水平对其英语议论文写作水平均有积极影响。(2)学生英语议论文写作水平与思辨的三个维度之间的相关系数从高到低依次为与技能、与知识及与态度,且作文水平与技能维度呈显著正向相关关系,这表明学生英语议论文水平与思辨能力技能维度关联性最为密切。(3)学生英语议论文中呈现的思辨技能与思辨三个维度的相关性从高到低依次为与知识、与技能及与态度,且作文水平与知识维度和技能维度均呈显著正向相关关系,这表明学生英语议论文中的思辨技能运用情况与思辨的知识维度和技能维度关联密切。根据以上研究发现,本研究对思辨能力培养和英语议论文写作教学实践提出了几点启示:(1)对于国内学生思辨情感倾向的培养,思辨态度中与中国传统文化相冲突的方面应得到重视;(2)学生思辨能力培养的过程中,需适当并持续不断地输入思辨知识(活化知识)与思辨技能;(3)学生英语议论文写作的提高过程中,思辨技能以及活化知识的提升尤为重要;反之,在思辨能力的培养过程中,教学过程可与适当的英语议论文写作任务相结合,写做任务既可当作思辨练习,也可作为思辨测试的方法。
[Abstract]:This study uses Stella Cotterell's "thinking: knowledge, skills and attitudes questionnaire", from the three dimensions of College Students' thinking and measurement, basic research in the relevant scholars to build up a consistent and speculative three dimensions of the research framework, as the evaluation reference papers in English argumentative thinking skills of students in this study. At the same time in college students' English argumentative as a starting point, the thinking skills and general evaluation of the two evaluation criteria of students' English argumentative score, students study English argumentative thinking skills and English argumentative writing level reflected in this paper. On this basis, the research on College Students' thinking questionnaire, English argumentative the correlation between the show and the thinking skills of English argumentative writing level three was explored in this study. Two The research questions are as follows: (1) Chinese college students thinking ability and thinking skills in English argumentative writing practice and how the status quo? (2) college students' thinking ability, the English argumentative thinking skills in actual use and what is the relation between the English argumentative writing level? The findings of this study are as follows. The survey results show that college students' thinking, more than 2/3 of the students on their own thinking (critical thinking) is "confident", however, there are still nearly 1/3 of the students for their lack of confidence thinking. The subjects in general students in the best speculative attitude, knowledge and skills dimensions also show good, but considering the students from key university. And the English argumentative evaluation shows a common subjects in English argumentative writing level is good, therefore, comprehensive consideration of the conclusion is that the subjects of speculation The ability to still have much room for improvement. This study also found that college students on the questionnaire results, the corresponding relationship between the English argumentative thesis shows the speculative skills and English argumentative writing level of three is: (1) students' English argumentative writing level and the use of speculative skills (Argumentation) and its the level of thinking (questionnaire) respectively. There is a positive correlation between the strong, which indicates that the thinking skills of students and the overall level of speculation on their English argumentative writing level has positive influence. (2) the correlation coefficient between the three dimensions of English argumentative writing level of students and speculative from high to low in turn with the skills and knowledge and attitude, and the level of writing skills and dimension was significantly positive correlation, which indicates that the students' English argumentative level and critical thinking skills dimensions most relevance Close. (3) the students present thinking skills and related thinking in three dimensions from high to low and knowledge on English and skills and attitude, and the dimension of knowledge and skills level of composition and dimensions have a significant positive correlation, which indicates that the students' English argumentative thinking in the application of skills work closely with the dimension of knowledge and skills related to dimension of speculation. According to the above findings, this study proposes some enlightenment of thinking ability and teaching practice of English Argumentative Writing: (1) for the cultivation of domestic students emotional thinking, thinking attitude and Chinese traditional culture conflicting aspects should be emphasized; (2 the process of cultivating students' critical thinking skills), properly and continuously input critical knowledge (activation knowledge) and thinking skills; (3) improving students English argumentative writing papers in the process, critical thinking skills and activation The promotion of knowledge is particularly important. On the contrary, in the process of cultivating the ability of thinking, the teaching process can be combined with the task of writing English argumentative writing. Writing tasks can be regarded as a critical exercise as well as a method of speculative testing.

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H319.3

【参考文献】