当前位置:主页 > 外语论文 > 英语论文 >

合作原则和礼貌原则视角下《麦田里的守望者》霍尔顿的“脏话”研究

发布时间:2018-04-20 01:15

  本文选题:合作原则和礼貌原则 + 霍尔顿 ; 参考:《重庆师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:杰罗姆·大卫·塞林格(Jerome David Salinger)是美国的20世纪50年代最具代表的作家,他的代表作《麦田里的守望者》被认为是美国文学历史的经典作品之一。《麦田里的守望者》出版以来受到了广大读者的追捧和热爱,但是主人公霍尔顿的“脏话”语言也引起了很大的争议。作为引导美国文学创作新潮的作品,从文学批评的角度已有很多研究。但是从语用学的角度鉴赏这部小说却并不多见。本文通过合作原则与礼貌原则对小说主人公霍尔顿在对话中的“脏话”语言进行详细分析,并认识“脏话”背后霍尔顿的形象。本文对Jerome David Salinger和《麦田里的守望者》进行简要介绍,回顾《麦田里的守望者》的国内外研究情况,基于格莱斯的合作原则和立奇的礼貌原则分析霍尔顿“出口成脏”的语言特征。即合作原则中的质量准则、数量准则、关联准则、方式准则和礼貌原则中的得体准则、赞誉准则、一致准则、同情准则,探讨霍尔顿带着“脏话”违反合作或礼貌原则的原因,以及“脏话”背后的人物形象。本文主要研究以下两个问题:一、霍尔顿为什么违反合作或礼貌原则时使用“脏话”?二、通过违反上述原则,霍尔顿的“脏话”塑造了什么样的人物形象?通过分析,本文认为,霍尔顿在对话中使用“goddam,hell,bitch”等脏话,有意地违反了合作或礼貌原则,其是要发泄压抑在心中不满,愤怒,害怕的情绪。霍尔顿通过叛逆的“脏话”来掩盖内心的孤独,抗拒和无奈,即使霍尔顿厌恶虚伪的成人世界,向往着内心的美好,却摆脱不了世俗的生活。从而塑造出霍尔顿作为一名孤独的守望者、成人世界的抗拒者、以及社会的妥协者的人物形象。
[Abstract]:Jerome David Salinger is the most representative American writer in the 1950s. His masterpiece, the Catcher in the Rye, is considered one of the classics of American literary history. But Holden's "dirty words" language also caused great controversy. A lot of research has been done from the angle of literary criticism as a guide to American literary creation. However, it is rare to appreciate the novel from the perspective of pragmatics. Based on the principle of cooperation and politeness, this paper makes a detailed analysis of Holden's "dirty language" language in the dialogue, and understands the image of Holden behind it. This paper gives a brief introduction to Jerome David Salinger and Catcher in the Rye, and reviews the domestic and foreign researches on the Catcher in the Rye. Based on Grice's principle of cooperation and Richie's principle of politeness, this paper analyzes Holden's linguistic characteristics of "exporting dirty". That is, the quality criterion, quantity criterion, association criterion, method criterion and propriety criterion of politeness principle, praise criterion, consensus criterion, sympathy criterion, discuss the reason why Holden violates the principle of cooperation or politeness with "dirty words". And the characters behind the dirty words. This paper focuses on the following two questions: first, why Holden used "dirty words" when violating the principle of cooperation or politeness? Second, by violating the above principles, Holden's "dirty words" created what kind of character image? Through analysis, this paper holds that Holden deliberately violates the principle of cooperation or politeness by using dirty words such as "goddamn hellBitch" in the dialogue, which is intended to vent the feelings of discontent, anger and fear in his heart. Holden hides his loneliness, resistance and helplessness through rebellious "dirty words". Even though Holden loathes the hypocritical adult world and yearns for inner beauty, he can not get rid of the worldly life. Thus the image of Holden as a lonely watchman, an adult world resister, and a social compromise is created.
【学位授予单位】:重庆师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H313

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王竹青;苗兴伟;;文学语篇的语言艺术分析框架——《麦田守望者》的功能文体分析[J];外国语文;2015年01期

2 管南异;;《麦田里的守望者》在中国的传播与失落[J];外国文学研究;2013年02期

3 韦玫竹;;多维度试析《麦田里的守望者》“纯洁”主题[J];广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年01期

4 孙二平;宗蔚;;论《麦田里的守望者》中“美国梦”的破灭[J];宿州学院学报;2009年03期

5 张荣建;会话分析与批判会话分析[J];四川外语学院学报;2005年02期

6 袁雪生;回归童年 回归自然——生态批评视野中的《麦田里的守望者》[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年03期

7 田贵森;;禁忌语的交际功能[J];外国语言文学研究;2003年02期

8 茅芽;“脏话”的意义——王立纯小说《甜菜进行曲》的语言分析[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期

9 程巍;霍尔顿与脏话的政治学[J];外国文学评论;2002年03期

10 朱晶;《麦田里的守望者》:反叛迂腐与虚伪的“现代经典”[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2002年04期



本文编号:1775576

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/1775576.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3435e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com