高中生英语短文改错水平调查
本文选题:高中英语 + 短文改错水平 ; 参考:《闽南师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:英语短文改错题是集多个语法知识点和多项语言技能于一体的综合语言测试项目。这道题既考查了学生准确、综合运用语言知识的能力,又考查了学生发现、判断和纠正错误的能力以及独立思考、分析问题的能力,这些正是高中核心素养中的核心能力。因此,调查高中生短文改错水平状况,针对他们在短文改错中存在的问题提出相应对策有重要作用。本研究随机选取红安县第三中学高二年级120名学生作为被试,通过两次短文改错测试从词法、句法、行文逻辑三个层面来了解学生的英语短文改错水平,并采取半结构式访谈来了解学生对短文改错的认识。研究发现:(1)学生短文改错总体水平不容乐观,两次测试所得均分分别为2.66和3.98(满分为10分);三个层面中,学生在词法上的改错水平高于在句法和行文逻辑上的改错水平;学生两次短文改错测试成绩与各自英语总分之间的相关系数分别为0.713和0.745,拟合度为0.509和0.555,呈较强正相关,表明高中生短文改错水平能在较大程度上反映其英语总体水平;(2)高低分组学生在两次测试中的均分相差3.00分以上,且独立样本T检验结果显示测试一成绩中的T值为12.752、显著性概率为0.000,测试二成绩中的T值为9.905,显著性概率均为0.000。这表明高低分组学生在两次测试中的水平差异比较明显,尤其在句法和行文逻辑层面,高分组学生的改错水平明显高于低分组学生的水平。对调查结果进行深入讨论发现学生在短文改错中主要存在四个问题:语法知识不够系统;语篇意识淡薄;语言负迁移严重;学习策略使用不佳。针对本文调查和讨论结果,本研究提出四条对策:(1)完善语法结构;(2)加强语篇意识;(3)消减语言负迁移;(4)强化学习策略。
[Abstract]:English essay correction is a comprehensive language test that integrates multiple grammatical knowledge points and multiple language skills. This question not only examines the students' ability to use language knowledge accurately and synthetically, but also examines the students' ability to find, judge and correct mistakes, as well as the ability to think independently and analyze problems. These are the core abilities in high school core literacy. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the situation of senior high school students' error-correcting level, and to put forward the corresponding countermeasures to solve the problems. In this study, 120 students of Grade 2 in Hongan No. 3 Middle School were randomly selected as subjects, and the students' level of English essay correction was studied from three levels: lexical, syntactic and textual logic. And use half-structured interviews to understand the students' understanding of the correction of the passage. The average scores of two tests were 2.66 and 3.98 (with a full score of 10 points), the level of error-correcting in lexical terms was higher than that in syntactic and textual logic in the three levels, the average scores of the two tests were 2.66 and 3.98 respectively, and the average scores of the two tests were 2.66 and 3.98, respectively, and the level of error-correction in the three levels was higher than that in syntax and logic. The correlation coefficients between the scores of the two essay correction tests and their total English scores were 0.713 and 0.745, respectively, and the fitting degrees were 0.509 and 0.555, respectively, showing a strong positive correlation. The results show that the average scores of high and low group students in the two tests are more than 3. 00 points, which can reflect their overall English proficiency to a large extent. The results of independent sample T test showed that the T value of test one score was 12.752, the significant probability was 0.000, the T value of test two score was 9.905, and the significant probability was 0.000. This shows that the level of students in high and low groups in the two tests is quite different, especially in syntax and logic level, the error correction level of high score students is obviously higher than that of low group students. It is found that there are four main problems in the process of correcting mistakes in short texts: inadequate grammatical knowledge, weak sense of discourse, serious negative transfer of language, and poor use of learning strategies. Based on the findings of the present study, the present study proposes four strategies: 1) to perfect the grammatical structure and 2) to strengthen the textual awareness) to reduce the negative transfer of language.
【学位授予单位】:闽南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曾绛;;完形、改错的语言测试与专门用途英语语能考测[J];外语电化教学;2016年03期
2 马郑豫;张家军;;中小学学生学习策略的调查研究[J];教育研究;2015年06期
3 张晓鹏;董晓丽;;中国学生对英语名词可数性习得研究[J];外语教学与研究;2015年02期
4 李英;;论高考英语短文改错题存在的必要性——从对比语言学的角度探究二语习得中的错误成因[J];贵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2014年06期
5 杨宏波;辜向东;杨志强;;2010~2012年高考英语短文改错题命题质量探究[J];教育测量与评价(理论版);2013年07期
6 赵小东;刘洋;;基于语料库的英语专业大学生写作时态错误分析[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
7 唐华;;高考英语全国卷短文改错试题历时分析[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
8 王盈盈;;语言迁移对大学生写作的影响[J];外语学刊;2012年03期
9 王彩青;于万锁;;高考英语短文改错题型设错类型及归因探究[J];教学与管理;2012年09期
10 张继红;;2011年7套高考英语短文改错题的内容效度分析[J];教育测量与评价(理论版);2011年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 秦建军;高考英语短文改错测试对英语写作的反拨作用研究[D];西北师范大学;2015年
2 许宁宁;关中地区城镇高中英语短文改错教学现状调查[D];延安大学;2014年
3 靳文方;基于语料库对高考英语短文改错的内容效度研究[D];陕西师范大学;2014年
4 邹U,
本文编号:1830327
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/1830327.html