汉语花园路径句理解的研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 19:44

本文选题：汉语花园路径句 + 歧义消解　；参考：《天津师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本篇论文旨在通过实验的方法对三种不同类型的汉语花园路径句进行研究,探讨这种特殊句式的解读,并试图回答歧义消解与曲解残留是否并存于不同类型的汉语花园路径句中以及不同类型汉语花园路径句的理解难度是否有差异。此外,本文也旨在发现汉语本族语者和汉语学习者关于汉语花园路径句的理解是否有差异和导致这种差异的因素。共有145名被试参与本次实验。被试回答给定的理解问题,其目的在于探寻他们能否正确的理解汉语花园路径句。分析实验数据表明:1)歧义消解与曲解残留并存于不同类型的汉语花园路径句中。2)汉语本族语者对不同类型汉语花园路径句的解歧程度有差异,相对的难度等级为一类型汉语花园路径句三类型汉语花园路径句二类型汉语花园路径句。3)汉语本族语者和汉语学习者关于汉语花园路径句的理解有差异,这种差异是由语言背景以及语言熟练程度引起的。本文的实验结果为Christianson提出的"足够好"假说提供了另一种实证证据。这项研究有助于促进语文教学与学习。将来的研究可以提供多样化的母语测试材料和结构来进一步探究句子加工的机制。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to study three different types of Chinese garden path sentences by means of experiments, and to explore the interpretation of this special sentence structure. The author also tries to answer whether ambiguity resolution and misinterpretation residues coexist in different types of Chinese garden path sentences and whether there are differences in the difficulty of understanding different types of Chinese garden path sentences. In addition, this paper also aims to find out whether there are differences in the understanding of Chinese garden path sentences between native Chinese speakers and Chinese learners and the factors leading to the differences. A total of 145 participants participated in the experiment. The purpose of answering a given understanding question is to find out whether they can correctly understand the Chinese garden path sentence. The experimental data show that the ambiguity resolution and the residual misinterpretation coexist in different types of Chinese garden path sentences. 2) the degree of disambiguation of different types of Chinese garden path sentences is different among native speakers. The relative difficulty level is one type of Chinese garden path sentence, three types of Chinese garden path sentence, two types of Chinese garden path sentence. 3) there are differences in understanding of Chinese garden path sentence between native speakers and Chinese learners. This difference is caused by language background and language proficiency. The experimental results provide another empirical evidence for Christianson's "good enough" hypothesis. This research helps to promote Chinese teaching and learning. Future research can provide a variety of native language testing materials and structures to further explore the mechanism of sentence processing.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H314

【参考文献】