语言经济学视角下商务英语信函中模糊限制语分析
发布时间:2018-06-21 06:54
本文选题:语言经济学 + 模糊限制语 ; 参考:《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:模糊性一直是自然界的一个基本现象。自从1965年扎德发表论文《模糊集》以来,模糊语言学应运而生并得到广泛关注。在这之后,美国语言学家莱考夫于1972年提出了模糊限制语这个概念。他把模糊限制语定义为“把事物变得模糊的词语”。模糊限制语是最典型的模糊语言。迄今为止,模糊限制语已经被广泛应用于各种社交场合,其中在商务信函中最为典型。因此,关于商务信函中模糊限制语的研究一直得到持续关注并取得了许多科研成果。语言是人类经济和社会活动中必不可少的的工具。随着人力资本理论和教育经济学的发展,语言在经济学中的地位日益凸显。直到1965年,信息经济学家马尔沙克首次提出了语言经济学理论。该理论是一门新兴的跨经济学和语言学的边缘交叉学科。语言经济学认为经济学与探求最优化的语言结构有密切关系。同时,语言具有与其他资源一样的经济特性,即价值、效用、成本和收益。对于这四个方面的探讨与分析已经成为语言经济学研究的重要内容。语言经济学用经济学的理论和方法去审视语言学,为语言学的研究注入了新的活力。基于语言经济学理论,本文对商务英文信函中的模糊限制语做了深入分析。一方面,作者通过定量分析法对模糊限制语在八种类型的商务英文信函中的分布情况做了调查。模糊限制语的分类是依据普瑞斯等人的研究成果。另一方面,作者通过定性分析法从语言经济学的角度对商务英文信函中模糊限制语的经济特性进行了探讨。分析框架是依据马尔沙克提出的语言的四个经济特性。首先,模糊限制语的价值特性是依据它的市场价值和非市场价值进行分析。第二,模糊限制语的效用特性是依据经济学中的稀缺性和网络外部性进行分析。第三,模糊限制语的成本特性是从商务活动中沟通成本的角度进行分析。最后,模糊限制语的效益特性是根据经济学中的理性经济人和帕累托最优进行分析。总之,本文旨在调查模糊限制语在商务英文信函中的分布情况和揭示其经济特性。本文不仅丰富了语言经济学理论,也为模糊限制语的研究提供了全新的理论视角。此外,本文也帮助商务人员弄清商务英文信函中模糊限制语的经济效果,促进商务沟通。在商务英文信函中恰当使用模糊限制语不仅维护了交易者的利益,而且会促成互利共赢的良好局面。最后,希望本文给读者一些启发,为以后相关研究提供一些借鉴。
[Abstract]:Fuzziness has always been a basic phenomenon in nature. Since Zadeh published his paper Fuzzy set in 1965, fuzzy linguistics has emerged as the times require and received wide attention. After this, American linguist Lakoff put forward the concept of hedges in 1972. He defined hedges as words that make things vague. Hedges are the most typical hedges. So far, hedges have been widely used in various social situations, especially in business letters. Therefore, the research on hedges in business letters has been paid more and more attention and many achievements have been made. Language is an indispensable tool in human economic and social activities. With the development of human capital theory and educational economics, language plays an increasingly important role in economics. Until 1965, the information economist Marshak first put forward the theory of linguistic economics. This theory is a new cross-disciplinary between economics and linguistics. Linguistic economics holds that economics is closely related to the search for optimal linguistic structures. At the same time, language has the same economic characteristics as other resources, namely value, utility, cost and benefit. The discussion and analysis of these four aspects has become an important part of linguistic economics. Linguistic economics uses the theory and method of economics to examine linguistics, which infuses new vitality into the study of linguistics. Based on the theory of linguistic economics, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of hedges in English business letters. On the one hand, the author investigates the distribution of hedges in eight types of English business letters by means of quantitative analysis. The classification of hedges is based on the research results of Prius et al. On the other hand, the author explores the economic characteristics of hedges in English business letters from the perspective of linguistic economics through qualitative analysis. The analytical framework is based on the four economic characteristics of language proposed by Marshack. Firstly, the value characteristics of hedges are analyzed according to their market value and non-market value. Secondly, the utility of hedges is based on the scarcity and network externalities in economics. Thirdly, the cost characteristics of hedges are analyzed from the perspective of communication costs in business activities. Finally, the benefit characteristics of hedges are analyzed according to rational economic man and Pareto optimum in economics. In a word, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the distribution of hedges in English business letters and to reveal their economic characteristics. This thesis not only enriches the theory of linguistic economics, but also provides a new theoretical perspective for the study of hedges. In addition, this paper also helps business people to understand the economic effects of hedges in English business letters and promote business communication. The proper use of hedges in English business letters not only protects the interests of traders, but also contributes to a win-win situation. Finally, I hope this paper can enlighten readers and provide some reference for future research.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H313
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邱丽洪;;现代商务沟通在国际贸易中的作用——以外贸函电为例[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2013年04期
2 吴光亭;;国内模糊限制语研究的多维视角述评[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2013年01期
3 张卫国;;遮蔽与澄明:语言经济学的几个基本问题[J];学术月刊;2012年12期
4 张卫国;刘国辉;;中国语言经济学研究述略[J];语言教学与研究;2012年06期
5 黄少安;张卫国;苏剑;;语言经济学及其在中国的发展[J];经济学动态;2012年03期
6 李宇明;;语言也是“硬实力”[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年05期
7 张卫国;;语言政策与语言规划:经济学与语言学比较的视角[J];云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年05期
8 张卫国;;语言的经济学分析:一个综述[J];经济评论;2011年04期
9 徐大明;;有关语言经济的七个问题[J];云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
10 张忻;;语言的经济学与大学英语教育[J];中南大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 黄少安;苏剑 ;张卫国;;语言经济学与中国的语言产业战略[N];光明日报;2012年
2 张卫国;;经济学分析为语言规划研究注入新活力[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
,本文编号:2047662
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2047662.html