美国经济类政治语篇的隐喻架构分析——以2012年奥巴马和罗姆尼的总统竞选辩论为例

发布时间：2018-07-02 23:44

本文选题：经济辩论 + 概念隐喻　；参考：《外国语言文学》2016年01期

【摘要】：文章以概念隐喻理论、架构理论和美国两党道德模式为框架,选取2012年美国首场总统竞选辩论中奥巴马和罗姆尼有关经济议题的辩论文本为语料,考察了其中的概念隐喻并对比分析了同一概念隐喻背后不同的架构。研究表明:奥巴马和罗姆尼均使用"发展经济是旅程"和"国家预算是家庭预算"的概念隐喻来建构美国经济现实,表述各自经济政策,合法化自身和非法化对手以达到劝说美国民众的目的;"旅程"隐喻中奥巴马的国家支持教育和培训架构、增税架构源于"慈父"模式及"关爱、责任"等核心价值观,罗姆尼的个人自谋出路获取培训架构、减税架构受"严父"模式、奖惩道德和"自律、独立"价值观的影响。
[Abstract]:Based on the conceptual metaphor theory, the framework theory and the bipartisan moral model of the United States, the text of the debate on economic issues between Obama and Romney during the first presidential debate in the United States in 2012 is selected as the corpus. The conceptual metaphors are examined and the different structures behind the same conceptual metaphors are compared and analyzed. The study shows that both Obama and Romney use conceptual metaphors of "development economy is a journey" and "state budget is a family budget" to construct the economic reality of the United States and express their respective economic policies. Legalize oneself and illegalize opponents to persuade the American people; "Journey" metaphor for Obama's national support for education and training structure, tax increase structure derived from the "fatherhood" model and "love, responsibility" and other core values, Romney's own way out of the training structure, tax cuts by the "strict father" model, rewards and punishment of ethics and "self-discipline, independent" values.
【作者单位】：南京信息工程大学语言文化学院;南京师范大学外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究一般项目“基于语料库的当代美国政治语篇的架构隐喻模式分析”(项目批准号:11YJA740085)阶段性成果
【分类号】：H315

【相似文献】