香港朗文初中英语与人教版初中英语课本比较研究
[Abstract]:Textbook is the carrier of curriculum requirement and educational idea, and the core component of classroom teaching. It is not only the concrete embodiment of curriculum objectives and contents, but also the main tool for teachers and students to carry out teaching activities. Therefore, it is very important to evaluate the quality of English textbooks. In this study, two sets of junior high school English textbooks published by the people's Education Publishing House and Longman Activate published by Pearson Publishing Company of Hong Kong were chosen as the objects of comparison. This paper makes a systematic comparative analysis of cultural consciousness, language knowledge and language skills in order to provide some reference for textbook users and writers, and to provide reference basis for the reform and construction of junior high school English textbooks in China. The study found that textbooks are all about topic learning. Involved in a wide range of subjects, rich in content, can arouse the interest of students. Unit arrangement accords with the law of language learning, and it also pays attention to providing various learning strategies for the development of students' language skills in textbook teaching activities. However, there are some shortcomings in the textbook, such as too large vocabulary and insufficient real context settings in the textbook. Longman textbook has advanced teaching ideas, reasonable curriculum design, emphasis on the creation of real language environment, and close to students' life. Although the textbook pays attention to the introduction of local culture in Hong Kong, the content of Chinese traditional culture is seriously inadequate, which makes students lack a full understanding of the development of Chinese history and traditional culture. The present study suggests that textbook writers should choose as much as possible to keep pace with the times and to keep close to the actual life content and language vocabulary. Create real context for learners as much as possible and appropriately increase the proportion of native culture. Teachers can flexibly use textbooks according to the actual situation, can be necessary to delete, replace and supplement the textbooks according to specific conditions.
【学位授予单位】:洛阳师范学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 廖燕怡;;初中英语教材中的本土文化内容分析——以粤港两地为例[J];新西部(理论版);2014年11期
2 霍秉坤;叶慧虹;黄显华;;香港教科书的编辑:提升质量的建议[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
3 杨婷;;新课程标准视角下各版本小学英语教材现状调查[J];党史文苑;2010年10期
4 杨黎霞;;人教版与师大版高中新课程《英语》实验教材(必修部分)比较[J];教育科学研究;2008年03期
5 鲁红霞;;国内外英语教材评价研究[J];基础教育外语教学研究;2007年04期
6 刘道义;浅议英语教材的评价标准[J];教育实践与研究;2004年12期
7 苏鸿;论中小学教材结构的建构[J];课程.教材.教法;2003年02期
8 乔爱玲;从外语教材编写的宏观设计与微观设计评估教材[J];山东外语教学;2002年03期
9 任丹凤;;中德英语教科书之比较与启示[J];上海教育;2001年24期
10 郭晓明;从“圣经”到“材料”——论教师教材观的转变[J];高等师范教育研究;2001年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 叶文静;中国大陆与香港高中英语教材之比较研究[D];福建师范大学;2014年
2 毕玉;香港小学英语教科书《Magic》之构架与特点研究[D];上海师范大学;2012年
3 张幸;人教版《PEP》和康轩版《Hello Darbie》小学英语教材设计的比较研究[D];中央民族大学;2011年
4 高中萍;中韩小学英语教材内容比较研究[D];温州大学;2011年
5 刘莹;《Go for it!》教材与JEFC教材比较研究[D];东北师范大学;2009年
6 杨素祯;新旧人教版初中英语教材比较研究[D];河北大学;2008年
7 吕晔;两套高职高专英语教材的比较与分析[D];华东师范大学;2006年
8 甘火花;人教版初中英语新旧教科书编制比较研究[D];西南大学;2006年
9 汤丽伟;初中英语教材比较研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2005年
,本文编号:2299377
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2299377.html