复合谓词的语义特征及构式化特征探究
发布时间：2021-10-18 14:42
复合谓词指Have/Take/Make/Give/Do+A+NDEV这样的结构。具体如:have a look,take a walk,make a tour,等。以往的相关研究（Stein 1991;Algeo 1995:204）认为,复合谓词表达的句法功能、语义功能与其对应的行为动词（如look,walk,tour）相同。复合谓词表现出某种半词汇化-半语法化的句法、语义功能特征（Brinton2008:33-53）,它们同时表达“有界体标记”语法功能（Traugott&Trausdale 2013:34-35）。然而,关于复合谓词还有一些基本语义功能特征,在此前的国内外相关研究中尚未涉及。具体如,复合谓词的构式义、转喻义、构式化特征等。本研究主要探究以下议题:1)复合谓词表达哪些语义功能?复合谓词表现出怎样的句法-语义功能?本研究揭示的复合谓词的语义功能与前人的研究有何不同?2)为什么说复合谓词属于双层语法转喻而非单层转喻现象?作为语法转喻,复合谓词中涉及的转喻操作是怎样的?3)复合谓词为什么可视为一种构式?复合谓词表现出怎样的构式化特征?5个复合谓词...
【文章来源】：广州大学广东省
【文章页数】：137 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background Introduction to Composite Predicates
1.2 Issues of This Thesis
1.3 Purposes and Significances of This Thesis
1.3.1 Purposes of This Thesis
1.3.2 Significances of This Thesis
1.4 Organization of The Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Study of Composite Predicates Abroad
2.2 Domestic Study of Composite Predicates
2.3 Comments on Previous Studies of Composite Predicates
2.3.1 The Advantages of Previous Studies
2.3.2 The Features of Previous Studies
2.3.3 The Disadvantages of Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 A Brief Introduction to the History and Development of Metonymy
3.1.1 Various Definitions of Conceptual Metonymy
3.1.1.1 Rhetorical View on Metonymy
3.1.1.2 Cognitive View on Metonymy
3.2 Classifications of Metonymy
3.3 Grammatical Metonymy and Its Features
3.3.1 Grammatical Metonymy
3.3.2 Features of Grammatical Metonymy
3.4 Constructionalization Theory(CT)
3.4.1 A Brief Introduction to CT
3.4.2 The Main Idea of CT
3.4.3 The Features of CT
Chapter Four Methodology of This Thesis
4.1 An Introduction to British National Corpus(BNC)
4.2 Design of the Research
4.3 Methods of Measuring Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality
4.3.1 Method of Measuring the Schematicity
4.3.2 Method of Measuring the Productivity
4.3.3 Method of Measuring the Compositionality
4.4 The Criteria of Classification of N_(DEV) in Composite Predicates
4.4.1 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Original Verb Meanings
4.4.2 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Behavior Features of Verbs
Chapter Five The Metonymic Feature,Construction Features,Syntactic-Semantic Features and the Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.1 The Metonymic Operation Model of Composite Predicates
5.2 The Construction Features of Composite Predicate
5.2.1 The Definition of Construction
5.2.2 The Causes of Composite Predicates Being Viewed as Constructions
5.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) of Composite predicates
5.3.1 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.1.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.1.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.1.3 The Semantic Features of Have and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.2.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.2.3 The Semantic Features of Take and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.3.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.3.3 The Semantic Features of Make and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.4.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.4.3 The Semantic Features of Give and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.5.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.5.3 The Semantic Features of Do and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.4 Comparative Analysis of N_(DEV) amidst Different Composite Predicates
5.4.1 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.2 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.5 The Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.5.1 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.1 Definitions of Schematicity
5.5.1.2 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.3 Different Degrees of Schematicity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2 The Productivity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2.1 Definition and Criteria of Productivity
5.5.2.2 Different Degrees of Productivity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3 The Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3.1 Definition and Criteria of Compositionality
5.5.3.2 Different Degrees of Compositionality Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.6 Comparative Analysis of Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of This Thesis
6.2 Implications of This Thesis
6.3 Limitations of This Study and Suggestions for Further Research
6.3.1 Limitations of This Study
6.3.2 Suggestions for Further Research on Composite Predicates
References
硕士研究生在校期间科研成果清单
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]《水浒传》中108将绰号的转喻研究[J]. 谢彦君. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版). 2019(01)
[2]复杂转喻现象探析[J]. 席建国. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版). 2019(01)
[3]《构式化与构式演变》介绍[J]. Elizabeth C.Traugott,Graeme Trousdale,黄劲伟. 当代语言学. 2018(01)
[4]英语轻动词与动转名词搭配特征研究——基于“词汇体”分布的实证研究[J]. 曾天娇,贾冠杰. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2017(06)
[5]浅析英语中的轻动词结构[J]. 戴婷婷. 广东蚕业. 2017(03)
[6]Have a NDev结构之语法转喻及构式化特征考察[J]. 席建国,王文斌. 外语研究. 2016(01)
[7]《构式化与构式变化》介绍[J]. 陈满华. 外语教学与研究. 2016(01)
[8]从构式语法看语言演变——《构式化与构式变异》评介[J]. 周洋. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2016(01)
[9]《构式化与构式演变》评介[J]. 李健雪,王焱. 现代外语. 2015(02)
[10]以构式功能为基础的英汉乏词义结构对比研究[J]. 仇伟. 外语教学. 2015(02)
博士论文
[1]英语虚化动词结构研究[D]. 张爱朴.上海外国语大学 2012
[2]英语乏词义结构的认知研究[D]. 仇伟.河南大学 2011
硕士论文
[1]英语轻动词的优化释义模型[D]. 王燕.广东外语外贸大学 2017
[2]基于语料库的英语轻动词结构研究[D]. 刘雯芳.中国矿业大学 2015
[3]英语VL-a-VN构式和汉语V-yi（一）-V构式对比分析[D]. 全金鑫.延边大学 2015
[4]构式语法视角下的英语轻动词构式研究[D]. 万阳.西南大学 2014
[5]动力意象图式下的轻动词语义研究[D]. 李娇枝.南京师范大学 2013
[6]英语虚义动词结构的语义和句法研究[D]. 廉美娜.延边大学 2011
本文编号：3442980
【文章来源】：广州大学广东省
【文章页数】：137 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background Introduction to Composite Predicates
1.2 Issues of This Thesis
1.3 Purposes and Significances of This Thesis
1.3.1 Purposes of This Thesis
1.3.2 Significances of This Thesis
1.4 Organization of The Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Study of Composite Predicates Abroad
2.2 Domestic Study of Composite Predicates
2.3 Comments on Previous Studies of Composite Predicates
2.3.1 The Advantages of Previous Studies
2.3.2 The Features of Previous Studies
2.3.3 The Disadvantages of Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 A Brief Introduction to the History and Development of Metonymy
3.1.1 Various Definitions of Conceptual Metonymy
3.1.1.1 Rhetorical View on Metonymy
3.1.1.2 Cognitive View on Metonymy
3.2 Classifications of Metonymy
3.3 Grammatical Metonymy and Its Features
3.3.1 Grammatical Metonymy
3.3.2 Features of Grammatical Metonymy
3.4 Constructionalization Theory(CT)
3.4.1 A Brief Introduction to CT
3.4.2 The Main Idea of CT
3.4.3 The Features of CT
Chapter Four Methodology of This Thesis
4.1 An Introduction to British National Corpus(BNC)
4.2 Design of the Research
4.3 Methods of Measuring Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality
4.3.1 Method of Measuring the Schematicity
4.3.2 Method of Measuring the Productivity
4.3.3 Method of Measuring the Compositionality
4.4 The Criteria of Classification of N_(DEV) in Composite Predicates
4.4.1 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Original Verb Meanings
4.4.2 Classification of N_(DEV) Based on Behavior Features of Verbs
Chapter Five The Metonymic Feature,Construction Features,Syntactic-Semantic Features and the Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.1 The Metonymic Operation Model of Composite Predicates
5.2 The Construction Features of Composite Predicate
5.2.1 The Definition of Construction
5.2.2 The Causes of Composite Predicates Being Viewed as Constructions
5.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) of Composite predicates
5.3.1 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.1.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.1.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Have+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.1.3 The Semantic Features of Have and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Have+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.2.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.2.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Take+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.2.3 The Semantic Features of Take and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Take+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.3.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.3.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Make+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.3.3 The Semantic Features of Make and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Make+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.4.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.4.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Give+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.4.3 The Semantic Features of Give and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Give+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5 The Syntactic-Semantic Features of N_(DEV) in Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.3.5.1 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.3.5.2 N_(DEV) Permitted into Do+A+N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior Features of Verbs
5.3.5.3 The Semantic Features of Do and the Constraint It Places on N_(DEV) of Do+A+N_(DEV)
5.4 Comparative Analysis of N_(DEV) amidst Different Composite Predicates
5.4.1 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.1.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Original Verb Meanings
5.4.2 Similarities and Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.1 The Similarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.4.2.2 The Dissimilarities of N_(DEV) Based on the Behavior of Original Verbs
5.5 The Constructionalization Characteristics of Composite Predicates
5.5.1 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.1 Definitions of Schematicity
5.5.1.2 The Schematicity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.1.3 Different Degrees of Schematicity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2 The Productivity of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.2.1 Definition and Criteria of Productivity
5.5.2.2 Different Degrees of Productivity Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3 The Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
5.5.3.1 Definition and Criteria of Compositionality
5.5.3.2 Different Degrees of Compositionality Among the Five Composite Predicates
5.6 Comparative Analysis of Schematicity,Productivity and Compositionality of the Five Composite Predicates
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of This Thesis
6.2 Implications of This Thesis
6.3 Limitations of This Study and Suggestions for Further Research
6.3.1 Limitations of This Study
6.3.2 Suggestions for Further Research on Composite Predicates
References
硕士研究生在校期间科研成果清单
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]《水浒传》中108将绰号的转喻研究[J]. 谢彦君. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版). 2019(01)
[2]复杂转喻现象探析[J]. 席建国. 佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版). 2019(01)
[3]《构式化与构式演变》介绍[J]. Elizabeth C.Traugott,Graeme Trousdale,黄劲伟. 当代语言学. 2018(01)
[4]英语轻动词与动转名词搭配特征研究——基于“词汇体”分布的实证研究[J]. 曾天娇,贾冠杰. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2017(06)
[5]浅析英语中的轻动词结构[J]. 戴婷婷. 广东蚕业. 2017(03)
[6]Have a NDev结构之语法转喻及构式化特征考察[J]. 席建国,王文斌. 外语研究. 2016(01)
[7]《构式化与构式变化》介绍[J]. 陈满华. 外语教学与研究. 2016(01)
[8]从构式语法看语言演变——《构式化与构式变异》评介[J]. 周洋. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2016(01)
[9]《构式化与构式演变》评介[J]. 李健雪,王焱. 现代外语. 2015(02)
[10]以构式功能为基础的英汉乏词义结构对比研究[J]. 仇伟. 外语教学. 2015(02)
博士论文
[1]英语虚化动词结构研究[D]. 张爱朴.上海外国语大学 2012
[2]英语乏词义结构的认知研究[D]. 仇伟.河南大学 2011
硕士论文
[1]英语轻动词的优化释义模型[D]. 王燕.广东外语外贸大学 2017
[2]基于语料库的英语轻动词结构研究[D]. 刘雯芳.中国矿业大学 2015
[3]英语VL-a-VN构式和汉语V-yi（一）-V构式对比分析[D]. 全金鑫.延边大学 2015
[4]构式语法视角下的英语轻动词构式研究[D]. 万阳.西南大学 2014
[5]动力意象图式下的轻动词语义研究[D]. 李娇枝.南京师范大学 2013
[6]英语虚义动词结构的语义和句法研究[D]. 廉美娜.延边大学 2011
本文编号：3442980
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/3442980.html
