现代汉语同动式的形式语义分析

发布时间：2018-01-30 08:28

本文关键词： 同动式空范畴原型范畴语义内涵谓词逻辑法组合范畴语法　出处：《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文借鉴原型理论的思想,以连动式和兼语式为参照,对现代汉语同动式的语义内涵进行考察;并运用谓词逻辑法和组合范畴语法等逻辑工具,对现代汉语同动式进行语义分析。全文共七章。第一章为文献综述,主要是对现代汉语复谓结构的研究现状进行梳理,确立本文的研究对象为现代汉语同动式,目的是准确地描述同动式的语义内涵。在第二章至第四章,对同动式进行本体研究,明确同动式的语法地位,考察同动式句法语义特征,为后面进行形式语义分析作必要的铺垫。第二章和第三章主要从外部着手,旨在厘清同动式与连动式、兼语式之间的关系;而第四章将视角转到同动式内部,给同动式进行分类。各章内容简述如下。第二章探讨同动式的特征和语法地位,为同动式正名。指出“共同施动”是同动式最为突出的语义内涵,不同于连动式“连续施动”和兼语式“致使施动”的语义内涵;认为应该将同动式看作一个独立句omsky提出的控制理论,但并不囿于其既有的理论框架。认为同动式中空范畴的准确解释应该是N0N1(记作PROij)。虽然这样的处理与Chomsky控制理论的式,并论证该处理方案的理论价值和实际益处。第三章旨在解释同动式中空范畴。虽借鉴了Ch相关准则相左,但却更符合汉语的语言事实。第四章将视角转到同动式内部,主要处理同动式的分类问题。首先指出现有分类的不足之处,然后根据新的标准来给同动式重新分类。最后,从原型理论的角度来描述和解释各个类型、乃至各个句式在语义上连绵渐进的关系。第五章和第六章是本文的核心,是在本体研究的基础上,借鉴数理逻辑的方法对同动式进行的形式语义分析。第五章主要运用谓词逻辑法来刻画同动式的语义内涵,得出相应的语义表达式。而第六章,首先比较了控制理论、构式语法和CCG三种语法理论的处理方案,并最终选定具有优势的CCG方案。然后对添加了照应算子的CCG│稍加改造,使之能够对同动式进行有效的句法-语义对应推演。第七章为本文的结论。首先陈述本文得到的结论,然后指出与研究对象相关,但在本文中尚未解决的问题。本文从认知和逻辑两个方面来分析同动式,将同动式看作一个独立的句式范畴,并进行了较为深入的研究。其中的考察、分析,有助于从语义内涵上厘清同动式与连动式、兼语式之间的关系;也能为对外汉语教学、翻译以及中文信息处理等领域提供理论参考,帮助我们解决一些实际的问题。
[Abstract]:Based on the thought of archetypal theory, this paper makes an investigation of the semantic connotations of the homotactic mode in modern Chinese, taking the conjunctive mode and the concurrent mode as the reference. And the use of predicate logic method and combinational category grammar and other logic tools to modern Chinese syntactic semantic analysis. The full text of seven chapters. The first chapter is a literature review. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the semantic connotation of the complex predicate structure in modern Chinese accurately. Chapter two to chapter 4th. In this paper, we study the syntactic semantic features of the syntactic syntactic and semantic characteristics of the syntactic syntactic and semantic characteristics of the syntactic syntactic and semantic characteristics of the syntactic syntactic and semantic characteristics of the syntactic syntactic and semantic characteristics. Chapter two and chapter three mainly start from the outside. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between the coactivity, the conjunctive and the paraphrase; In Chapter 4th, the angle of view is transferred to the interior of the homotactic type, which is classified. The contents of each chapter are summarized as follows. The second chapter discusses the characteristics and grammatical status of the co-verb. It is pointed out that "common action" is the most prominent semantic connotation of the "joint action", which is different from the semantic connotation of "continuous action" and "causative action". It is suggested that the co-verb should be regarded as the control theory proposed by omsky, an independent sentence. However, it is not confined to its existing theoretical framework. It is considered that the exact interpretation of the hollowed category of the coaction type should be N0N1 (referred to as PROIJN), although this treatment and the formula of Chomsky control theory. The third chapter aims to explain the hollowed category of coaction. However, it is more in line with the linguistic facts of Chinese. Chapter 4th will shift the perspective to the interior of the covariant, mainly dealing with the classification of the covariant. First of all, it points out the shortcomings of the existing classification. Then according to the new standards to reclassify the coaction. Finally, from the perspective of prototype theory to describe and explain the various types. Chapter 5th and Chapter 6th are the core of this paper and are based on the ontology research. Use the method of mathematical logic for reference to analyze the formal semantics of coactivity. Chapter 5th mainly uses predicate logic method to describe the semantic connotation of homotactic expression and obtains the corresponding semantic expression. Chapter 6th. Firstly, the control theory, construction grammar and CCG are compared. Finally, the CCG scheme with advantages is selected, and then the CCG with anaphora operator is modified slightly. Chapter 7th is the conclusion of this paper. First, the conclusion of this paper is stated, and then it is pointed out that it is related to the object of study. But in this paper, the unsolved problem. This paper from the cognitive and logical aspects of the analysis of co-activity, the co-verb as an independent category of sentence, and carried out a more in-depth study, the investigation, analysis. It is helpful to clarify the relationship between the syntactic, the conjunctive and the paraphrase from the semantic connotation. It can also provide theoretical reference for teaching Chinese as a foreign language, translation and Chinese information processing, and help us solve some practical problems.
【学位授予单位】：四川师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.3

【参考文献】