论我国公立高校教师职称评审权的公法规制

发布时间：2018-06-10 03:28

本文选题：公立高校 + 教师职称评审权　；参考：《高校教育管理》2017年04期

【摘要】：当前,在高等教育领域"放管服"改革逐步深化的宏观政策引导下,政府对公立高校教师职称评审的"审批式管理"开始被"质量导向"的"监管式治理"取代。据此,公立高校教师职称评审权的行政规制,正在由"显性"转向"隐性"。然而,这并未改变公立高校教师的职称评审权作为行政权的现实窘境,政府依旧将公立高校教师职称评审视为国家"委办事项"。要破解我国公立高校教师职称评审权规范与保障的一系列难题,必须走出将其界定为"内部管理权"抑或"行政权"的误区。从理想的状态而言,公立高校教师职称评审权应回归作为学术自治权的本质并被纳入公法规制的视野,进而形塑"国家法"与"大学法"良性互动的"合作规制"结构。
[Abstract]:At present, under the guidance of the macro policy of deepening the reform in the field of higher education, the "examination and approval management" of teachers' professional titles in public universities is beginning to be replaced by "quality oriented" regulatory governance ". Accordingly, the administrative regulation of teachers' professional title evaluation right in public universities is changing from "overt" to "recessive". However, this does not change the reality of the administrative power of the public university teachers' professional title evaluation power. The government still regards the public university teachers' professional title evaluation as a national "appointment matter". In order to solve a series of difficult problems in the regulation and guarantee of teachers' professional title evaluation right in public colleges and universities, we must go out of the misunderstanding of defining it as "internal management power" or "administrative power". From the ideal state, the evaluation right of teachers' titles in public colleges and universities should return to the essence of academic autonomy and be brought into the vision of public law regulation, thus shaping the "cooperative regulation" structure of "national law" and "university law".
【作者单位】：南京师范大学教育科学学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金“十二五”规划教育学一般课题(BIA130064)
【分类号】：G647

【相似文献】