批评架构理论框架下2015-2019年中、美高校开学典礼校长致辞中高等教育概念化的对比研究

发布时间：2021-06-25 17:01

　　本研究在架构理论和批评隐喻分析的基础上构建出批评架构分析框架,对中、美高校开学典礼校长致辞中隐喻性架构进行分析。本文旨在阐释受众理解和接受语言的认知机制,关注教育语篇背后的观念、意识以及社会理念的构建过程。本文根据2019QS世界大学排名情况,选择排行靠前的中、美各5所高校2015-2019年间校长在开学典礼上的致辞,共计50篇。本研究按以下三个步骤对文本进行分析:架构识别、架构分析、架构阐释。本研究在宏观层面上强调观念意识和社会文化的作用,在微观层面上强调受众对话语的认知过程。研究表明,中、美高校开学典礼校长致辞中均出现旅程架构、园艺架构和商业架构。旅程架构在两方语料占比最大,强调教师在教育过程中的引领和指导作用。园艺架构在中方语料中出现的频率远高于在美方语料中出现的频率,既体现了教师培养的重要性,又强调学生主动学习的必要性。根本原因是在中国教育史上,常以“桃李”比喻为学生,以“园丁”比喻教师。商业架构剖析了教育商业化的过程,各高校校长致辞中明确对高等教育商业化持反对态度。赋能架构、行军架构和舞台架构为中方语料特有架构。赋能架构体现了学生自主意识的觉醒,同时呼吁高校通过教育赋能的重要... 

【文章来源】：吉林大学吉林省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：240 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
内容提要
Synopsis
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Previous Studies on Conceptualization
        1.1.1 The Cognitive Basis of Conceptualization
        1.1.2 Studies on Conceptualization of Semantic Structure
        1.1.3 Studies on Conceptualization of Event Relations
    1.2 Previous Studies on University Presidents’Messages
        1.2.1 Studies from Linguistic Perspective
        1.2.2 Studies from Social Perspective
    1.3 Comments on Previous Studies
Chapter Two Theoretical Model and Research Methodology
    2.1 Theoretical Model
        2.1.1 Framing Theory as Foundation
        2.1.2 Critical Metaphor Analysis as Foundation
        2.1.3 Generation of Critical Framing Model
    2.2 Research Methodology
        2.2.1 Research Questions
        2.2.2 Data Collection
        2.2.3 Research Instruments
        2.2.4 Research Procedures
Chapter Three Metaphorical Frames in the Conceptualization of Higher Education and Their Motivations
    3.1 Metaphorical Frames in the Conceptualization of Chinese University President Convocation Speeches and Their Motivations
        3.1.1 JOURNEY Frame and Motivations
        3.1.2 GARDENING Frame and Motivations
        3.1.3 EMPOWERMENT Frame and Motivations
        3.1.4 MARCH Frame and Motivations
        3.1.5 STAGE Frame and Motivations
    3.2 Metaphorical Frames in the Conceptualization of American University President Convocation Speeches and Their Motivations
        3.2.1 JOURNEY Frame and Motivations
        3.2.2 COMMUNITY Frame and Motivations
        3.2.3 BUILDING Frame and Motivations
        3.2.4 WAR Frame and Motivations
        3.2.5 COMMERCE Frame and Motivations
    3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Similarities and Differences Between Metaphorical Frames in Chinese and American President Speeches and Their Causes
    4.1 Similarities in Metaphorical Frames and Their Causes
        4.1.1 JOURNEY Frame in the Two Corpora
        4.1.2 COMMERCE Frame in the Two Corpora
    4.2 Differences in Metaphorical Frames and Their Causes
        4.2.1 GARDENING Frame in the Two Corpora
        4.2.2 MARCH Frame in Chinese Corpus and WAR Frame in American Corpus
        4.2.3 EMPOWERMENT Frame in Chinese Corpus and BUILDING Frame in American Corpus
        4.2.4 STAGE Frame in Chinese Corpus
        4.2.5 COMMUNITY Frame in American Corpus
    4.3 Summary
Conclusion
References
Appendix Examples in Chinese and American President Convocation Speeches
作者简介及科研成果
Acknowledgements


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]全球气候危机话语的架构理论透视——以中美领导人的气候议题演讲为例[J]. 张薇,汪少华.  外语教学. 2020(01)
[2]英、汉空间量度语义系统对比研究[J]. 刘桂玲,杨忠.  西安外国语大学学报. 2019(02)
[3]英汉时空概念化方式差异:时空分立与时空同态[J]. 刘正光,徐皓琪.  外语教学与研究. 2019(02)
[4]汉英对动作和时间的不同概念化:时空性差异的映显[J]. 崔靓,王文斌.  外语教学理论与实践. 2019(01)
[5]“后真相”时代话语研究的新路径:批评架构分析[J]. 汪少华,张薇.  外语教学. 2018(04)
[6]英汉时间概念化差异对“前、后”时间指向对立的解释[J]. 刘正光,鄢克非,吕盈烟.  现代外语. 2018(05)
[7]类型学视野下的英汉形容词概念化差异及其对句法行为的影响[J]. 刘晋.  外国语文. 2018(03)
[8]英语集合名词数概念生成与形式表征的双重概念化研究[J]. 秦裕祥,秦茜茜.  外语教学与研究. 2016(06)
[9]2016年中国大学毕业典礼演讲的积极话语分析——评价理论视角[J]. 张瑜珂.  湖北科技学院学报. 2016(11)
[10]认知语言学视域下英汉爱情隐喻的哲学基础与文化映射[J]. 贺杰,周流溪.  当代外语研究. 2015(11)

硕士论文
[1]美国高校校长毕业典礼致辞中的模糊限制语分析[D]. 刘博.西安外国语大学 2018
[2]篇章语言学视角下的中德两国大学校长开学典礼致辞的对比研究[D]. 李旭纹.广东外语外贸大学 2018



本文编号：3249585