汉学家译注中的文化形象建构——以《离骚》的三种译注为例

发布时间：2018-01-30 23:31

本文关键词： 汉学家《离骚》译注文化形象　出处：《外语与外语教学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文通过比较宇文所安、沃森、霍克思在《离骚》英译注释中建构的“文化英雄”形象、“美人”形象、“巫”形象和“神”形象的异同,运用形象学、训诂学分析了不同形象的表现形式及其背后不同译者的文化价值观、学术思想和文化态度。研究发现,在三种译注里的文化形象建构中,宇文所安倾向于儒家圣人形象的“圣化”和中国神话人物形象的“神化”;沃森注重儒家和道家形象的世俗化;霍克思则兼顾形象的中西合璧化。由此认为,宇文所安和沃森的注释,基本遵循了中国古代楚辞学家的训诂学释义,霍克思的译注既传承了中国民族文化的传统,又注重西方读者的接受。但是,由于自身的西方本土文化身份和对文献背景考据的不足,他们对中国文化形象的建构必然存在误读。尽管如此,这些汉学家的译注对中国典籍的译注与传播具有重要的启示意义。
[Abstract]:By comparing the similarities and differences between the images of "cultural hero", "beauty", "witch" and "god", which are constructed in the English translation notes of Yu Wensu-an, Watson and Hawkes, this paper applies imageology. Exegetics analyzes the manifestations of different images and the cultural values, academic thoughts and cultural attitudes of the different translators behind them. Yu is inclined to "consecrate" the image of Confucian sage and "deify" the figure of Chinese mythology. Watson paid attention to the secularization of Confucian and Taoist images. Hawkes, on the other hand, combined the Chinese and western images. Therefore, it is believed that YuWensuan and Watson's notes basically follow the interpretation of the exegetics of ancient Chinese scholars of Chu ci. Hawkes' translation not only inherits the tradition of Chinese national culture, but also pays attention to the acceptance of western readers. However, due to his own identity of western native culture and the lack of textual research on the literature background. Their construction of Chinese cultural image is bound to be misread. However, the translation of these Sinologists has important implications for the translation and dissemination of Chinese classics.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：H059
【正文快照】： 1. 引言西方汉学家有借助中国典籍译注解释中国文化的核心价值,通过译注建构中国文化形象的传统。译注不仅是重要的翻译策略,而且反映了译者的文化态度,是中国文化形象建构的具体体现,也是学术话语的建构的方式。英国汉学家大卫·霍克思在《南方之歌》(The Song of the Sout

【相似文献】