当前位置:主页 > 外语论文 > 英语论文 >

高中英语教学中学生思辨能力培养的实验研究

发布时间:2018-03-29 08:54

  本文选题:高中生 切入点:思辨能力 出处:《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:近十多年来,思辨能力的培养引起了各国教育学家的重视。思辨能力既是一种思维技能,也是一种人格和气质。思辨技能包括分析、推理、评价等方面的能力,而思辨人格倾向包括分析性、自信度、好奇心以及认知成熟度等特质。我国的高中英语新标准中也提出在高中英语教学中应着重培养学生的思辨能力和推理判断能力。而高中英语教学中往往注重的是语言知识和语言技能,忽视了思辨能力的培养。鉴于此,本研究将思辨能力培养融入高中英语课堂教学中,通过多维度教学目标、丰富合理的教学内容、多元化教学方法、多样化教学活动、科学合理的评价方式来培养学生的思辨能力,旨在能为高中英语教学改革提供可借鉴的教学案例。本研究选取了广西玉林高中高一年级两个平行班,共111名学生,在实验前后分别用修订版“加利福尼亚思辨技能量表”以及“加利福尼亚思辨倾向问卷”对控制组和实验组的学生进行测量。本次研究问题如下:1)学生入学时思辨能力总体情况如何?实验班与控制班学生的思辨能力有无差异?2)通过实验,实验组学生的思辨能力是否有所提高?实验组与控制组学生的思辨能力有无显著性差异?研究结果表明,刚进入高中阶段的学生普遍具有积极的思辨倾向以及一定的思辨技能。经过一个学期的实验教学后,无论在思辨倾向还是思辨技能上,实验组的学生较控制组的学生都有所提高。总体而言,实验组学生思辨能力倾向有所提高,七个维度中寻真性、开放性、分析性、系统性、成熟度有较显著提高,好奇心以及自信心有略微提高。同时,实验组的思辨技能也是总体有所提高,六个维度中除评估和推理有显著提高外,其它叫个维度都有略微提高。此外,学期末的访谈结果也表明,学生对在英语教学中培养思辨能力的教学设计较为满意,并认为其提高了他们的学习积极性。但由于研究者教学经验有限以及实验研究时间较短等因素,本研究还存在有不足之处,需要进一步改进。同时,教师和学生仍需在各个方面努力改善,从而提高高中生的思辨能力状况。
[Abstract]:In the last ten years or so, the cultivation of speculative ability has attracted the attention of educators all over the world. Speculative ability is not only a kind of thinking skill, but also a kind of personality and temperament. Speculative skills include the ability of analysis, reasoning, evaluation and so on. And speculative personality tendencies include analytics, confidence, Curiosity and cognitive maturity, etc. In the new English standard of senior high school in our country, it is also proposed that the students' speculative ability and reasoning and judgment ability should be cultivated in high school English teaching. However, in senior high school English teaching, emphasis is often placed on the following aspects. Language knowledge and language skills, In view of this, this study integrates the cultivation of speculative ability into the English classroom teaching in senior high school. Through multi-dimensional teaching objectives, it enriches reasonable teaching contents, diversified teaching methods, and diversified teaching activities. The purpose of this study is to provide a case study for English teaching reform in senior high school. This study selected 111 students from two parallel classes of grade one in Yulin Senior High School in Guangxi Province. The control group and the experimental group were measured before and after the experiment with the revised California speculative skills scale and the California speculative disposition questionnaire. What is the overall situation of discernment? Is there any difference in the students' thinking ability between the experimental class and the control class? 2) through the experiment, do the students in the experimental group improve their thinking ability? Is there a significant difference in the ability of thinking between the experimental group and the control group? The results show that students who have just entered high school generally have positive speculative tendencies and certain speculative skills. After a semester of experimental teaching, whether in speculative tendencies or speculative skills, The students in the experimental group were better than those in the control group. In general, the students in the experimental group were more inclined to think, and found truth, openness, analysis, systematicness and maturity in the seven dimensions. Curiosity and self-confidence improved slightly. At the same time, the thinking skills of the experimental group were also improved as a whole. In addition to the six dimensions, except for the significant improvement in evaluation and reasoning, the other dimensions were also slightly improved. The results of the interview at the end of the semester also show that the students are satisfied with the teaching design of cultivating speculative ability in English teaching. However, due to the limited teaching experience of the researchers and the short time of experimental research, there are still some deficiencies in this study, which need to be further improved. Teachers and students still need to improve their thinking ability in every way.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 马蓉;秦晓晴;;英语专业大学生的批判性思维倾向特征研究[J];西安外国语大学学报;2016年04期

2 黄远振;兰春寿;黄睿;;为思而教:英语教育价值取向及实施策略[J];课程.教材.教法;2014年04期

3 王世建;;高中生批判性思维倾向实证研究[J];山东师范大学外国语学院学报(基础英语教育);2014年01期

4 卫晓萍;;国外批判性思维研究概述[J];科教文汇(上旬刊);2014年02期

5 龚亚夫;;论基础英语教育的多元目标——探寻英语教育的核心价值[J];课程·教材·教法;2012年11期

6 李莉文;;英语写作中的读者意识与思辨能力培养——基于教学行动研究的探讨[J];中国外语;2011年03期

7 贺新全;何守仁;;论外语教学中学生批判性思维的培养[J];教学与管理;2010年27期

8 赖朝晖;;高中学生英语书面表达思维能力欠缺的成因及对策[J];中小学外语教学(中学篇);2009年04期

9 潘家明;;批判性阅读教学与批判性思维能力培养[J];教育探索;2009年03期

10 刘伟;郭海云;;批判性阅读教学模式实验研究[J];外语界;2006年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 金丹丹;关于高中英语课堂中学生思辨能力的调查研究[D];杭州师范大学;2015年

2 赖水芬;英语专业本科生思辨人格倾向调查研究[D];广西师范大学;2015年

3 林青;在大学英语教学中引入新闻英语对提高学生思辨能力的实证研究[D];闽南师范大学;2015年

4 苏全彩;论批判性思维与英语阅读教学[D];广西大学;2008年

5 韩孝实;阅读教学与学生批判性思维能力的培养[D];山东师范大学;2008年

6 孟艳君;护理专业本科学生评判性思维能力测评方法的研究[D];山西医科大学;2008年



本文编号:1680417

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/1680417.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户be2ec***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com