评价理论视域下中外学者期刊论文评论结果语步词块比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 03:20

本文选题：评价理论 + 学术词块　；参考：《外语与外语教学》2017年05期

【摘要】：本文从评价理论视角出发,比较分析中外学者在应用语言学期刊论文评论结果语步上词块使用的结构与评价意义的异同,旨在探究中国学者使用评价性语言资源的系统性和差异性特征。基于语料库的数据分析显示,中国学者在结构上倾向于更多使用动词词块和句干词块,而本族语学者则较多使用短语词块,这种差异说明中国学者对信息密集型语言结构操控不足。在语篇评价上,与本族语学者相比,中国学者较少使用引导词块、数量词块及限定词块且基本不使用模糊词块,这些差异说明中国学者在学术写作中引导读者理解的意识薄弱,缺乏对评价性词块资源的有效利用,因此致使语篇的客观性、协商性受损,互动性与对话性不足。基于研究发现,本研究对中国学者英语学术语篇写作有一定的启示。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of evaluation theory, this paper compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between the structure of lexical chunks and the evaluation meaning of lexical chunks used by Chinese and foreign scholars in the commentary results of applied linguistics journals. The purpose of this study is to explore the systematic and differential characteristics of the use of evaluative language resources by Chinese scholars. Corpus-based data analysis shows that Chinese scholars tend to use verb chunks and dry-word chunks more structurally, while native linguists tend to use phrasal chunks. This difference indicates that Chinese scholars have inadequate manipulation of information-intensive language structures. Compared with native linguists, Chinese scholars use fewer lexical chunks, quantitative lexical chunks and deterministic chunks, and do not use vague lexical chunks. These differences indicate that Chinese scholars have a weak sense of guiding readers' understanding in academic writing. The lack of effective use of evaluative lexical chunks leads to objectivity, negotiation and lack of interactivity and dialogue. Based on the findings of the study, this study has some implications for Chinese scholars' English academic discourse writing.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学规划基金一般项目“中学生外语语言能力发展的系统性和差异性研究”(项目编号:12YJA740050)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：H315

【相似文献】