英语专业学生说明性口语语篇语步分析——以对比类语篇为例
发布时间:2018-06-02 16:54
本文选题:说明性口语语篇 + 语步 ; 参考:《解放军外国语学院学报》2017年03期
【摘要】:本文借鉴Swales(1981)等的语步分析法对国内某重点高校英语专业三年级学生英语对比类说明性口语语篇进行语步分析,发现:1)对比类语篇一般包含"引言""相似性""差异性"和"回应"语步;2)语步、步骤和小句与语篇质量间分别呈高度、中等和弱正相关;3)高、中、低组在语步上差异显著,高、低组在步骤上差异显著;4)高、中组在语篇结构上比较完整,低分组语篇结构非常不完整;5)高、中、低组差异性语步功能实现较好,相似性语步功能实现较差。高、中组引言语步功能实现较好,回应语步功能实现不理想,低分组引言和回应语步功能实现都较差。
[Abstract]:This paper uses the stylistic analysis method of Swales/ 1981 et al to analyze the descriptive discourse of English contrast class among the third year English majors in some key colleges and universities in China. It is found that contrastive discourses generally contain "introduction" similarity "difference" and "response" step 2), the steps and clauses are highly correlated with the quality of the text, the middle and weak positive correlation is 3) high, and the difference between middle and low groups is significant and high. The low group has significant difference in step (4), the middle group is relatively complete in the text structure, the low group text structure is very incomplete (5) high, the middle and low groups have better realization of different speech step function, and the similar step function is poor. High, middle group speech step function is better, response language step function is not ideal, low group introduction and response step function are poor.
【作者单位】: 同济大学外国语学院;
【分类号】:H315
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 缪庭;;“说明性+叙述性”完形填空例析[J];新高考(语文数学英语);2007年12期
2 张淑艳;;八招解决词义猜测题[J];考试(高考英语版);2010年01期
3 王强;;第32课时 阅读理解(一)上补下联,猜词汇[J];文教资料;2002年10期
,本文编号:1969492
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/1969492.html