国内两套大学英语综合教材的对比研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 20:34

本文选题：《大学英语课程教学要求》 + 教材评价　；参考：《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：英语教学中,教材既是贯彻实施《大学英语课程教学要求》的关键,又是实现英语教学目标的重要材料和手段。英语教材适当与否不仅影响到教学方法的选择和应用,更影响到学生的学习效果。但是,随着大学英语教学改革的推进,研究者对对教材的关注远远不及对教学方法、教师及学习者等的关注。在中国,各种各样的大学英语教材不断涌现,虽各具特色,但质量良莠不齐。这种现状为英语教学带来了更多的困惑,所以选择合适的教材成为当务之急。那么,运用具有先进性、科学性、权威性和适用性的教材评估理论对教材进行对比分析不失为一种理想的方法。本研究致力于探索更加适合中国国情的教材评估标准和方法,完善我国教材评价理论,为大学英语教材编写提出合理化建议;在实践应用中,为教师选择、使用和改编教材提供帮助,并指导教材编写者的教材编写,以促进大学英语教学的良性发展。所以,笔者拟结合程晓棠及Cunningsworth等教材评估方法和评估理论,参考我国具体教学现状,对《新标准大学英语综合教程》和《全新版大学英语综合教程》进行详细的对比研究。一方面,从教学理念、教学方法、语言知识、语言技能、文化、语言素材和课程资源等方面对教材进行对比研究以进行内部评价;另一方面,通过问卷调查进行外部评价,以补充和验证内部评价。本研究拟探索如下问题:(1)两套教材的各自特色及不足是什么?(2)两套教材的适用性如何,是否满足了学生的需求?有何启示?研究发现,在《大学英语课程教学要求》的指导下,两套教材都善于运用多种教学方法,提供丰富语言素材和网络资源,并注重对学生综合能力及文化意识的培养。关于各自特点,《新标准大学英语综合教程》强调以人为本,重视人文性,环节设计紧密细致,然而课文稍有难度;《全新版大学英语综合教程》更加注重综合性和实用性,然而应试性强。整体而言,两套教材都能适应学生的需求。教材评估的开展有助于学生合理利用教材以提高学习效率,有助于教师选择、改编和使用教材以增强课堂教学效果。此外,也为教材分析评价提供更好的思路和启迪,为教材编写者提供更好的建议。
[Abstract]:In English teaching, the teaching material is not only the key to implement the requirements of College English course teaching, but also the important material and means to achieve the goal of English teaching. The appropriateness of English teaching materials not only affects the choice and application of teaching methods, but also affects the learning effect of students. However, with the development of college English teaching reform, researchers pay less attention to teaching materials than to teaching methods, teachers and learners. In China, a variety of college English textbooks continue to emerge, although each has its own characteristics, but the quality is mixed. This situation has brought more confusion for English teaching, so it is urgent to choose appropriate teaching materials. Therefore, it is an ideal method to compare and analyze the teaching materials by using the theory of evaluation of teaching materials, which is advanced, scientific, authoritative and applicable. This study is devoted to exploring the evaluation standards and methods of teaching materials that are more suitable for China's national conditions, perfecting the theory of textbook evaluation in China, and putting forward some reasonable suggestions for the compilation of college English textbooks. The use and adaptation of teaching materials to help and guide the textbook compilers to promote the sound development of college English teaching. Therefore, combining with the evaluation methods and theories of Cheng Xiaotang and Cunningsworth, and referring to the present situation of teaching in China, the author makes a detailed comparative study of New Standard College English Comprehensive course and New version of College English Comprehensive course. On the one hand, it makes a comparative study on the teaching materials from the aspects of teaching concept, teaching methods, language knowledge, language skills, culture, language materials and curriculum resources to carry out internal evaluation; on the other hand, the external evaluation is carried out through questionnaires. To supplement and validate internal evaluations. This study intends to explore the following questions: (1) what are the respective characteristics and shortcomings of the two sets of textbooks? (2) what is the applicability of the two sets of textbooks? does it satisfy the needs of the students? What's the message? It is found that under the guidance of College English course Teaching requirements, the two sets of textbooks are good at using various teaching methods, provide rich language materials and network resources, and pay attention to the cultivation of students' comprehensive ability and cultural consciousness. With regard to their respective characteristics, the New Standard College English Comprehensive course emphasizes people-oriented, attaches importance to humanism, and its links are closely and meticulously designed. However, the text is slightly more difficult; the New version of the Comprehensive College English course pays more attention to comprehensiveness and practicability. However, examination-oriented. As a whole, the two sets of textbooks can meet the needs of students. The evaluation of teaching materials is helpful for students to make use of teaching materials reasonably to improve their learning efficiency, and to help teachers to choose, adapt and use teaching materials to enhance the effectiveness of classroom teaching. In addition, it also provides better ideas and enlightenment for textbook analysis and evaluation, and better advice for textbook writers.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H319.3

【参考文献】