英语专业校本课程方案对比研究—设置、实施和效果
发布时间：2018-07-16 09:49
【摘要】："新大纲"的实施以及"新国标"的研制使得许多研究将重点转向英语专业课程设置。许多学者专家研究了英语专业课程设置、学生学习情况以及未来发展方向。然而,很少有研究对两个具体的课程设置进行对比,并且许多涉及英语专业课程设置未来发展方向的研究文章多是综述性文章。本研究是对两个班级的课程设置进行对比研究,从对比的视角研究不同课程设置方案的优劣,重点探讨两种课程方案的内容、实施情况和培养效果。本研究共有129名参与者,包括来自使用不同课程设置的120名学生和同时教授这些学生的9名任课老师。本研究采用定性与定量相结合的方法,通过问卷、半结构化访谈以及课堂观察来收集研究数据。本研究的结果表明两个课程设置在课程类型、学分设置和学时上有所不同。课程A包含许多语言技能训练的课程,而采用课程B的学生有较多的内容依托式课程,老师也会给他们留许多课后阅读材料。两个课程设置都配备了优秀的教师资源,采用类似的评估方式。采用两个课程设置的同学都具有良好的综合素质,但采用课程B的同学在知识水平和语言技能方面掌握较好。两套课程方案也有各自的优缺点。学生和老师普遍认为课程B更适合培养学术性人才,而课程A利于帮助学生巩固语言技能的基础。基于主要发现,本研究得出结论,具有较多内容依托式课程的方案能够更有效地培养学生的综合素质和学术能力。英语专业的课程设置应该适当进行调整来满足学生们的学术需求并提高他们的能力。本文最后还对未来的课程设置以及改革提出了一些建议。
[Abstract]:The implementation of the new syllabus and the development of the new national standard have led many studies to focus on the English major curriculum. Many scholars and experts have studied the English major curriculum, students' learning and future development. However, few studies have compared the two specific courses, and many research articles on the future development direction of English major curriculum are mostly summary articles. There were 129 participants in this study, including 120 students using different courses and 9 teachers who taught them at the same time. In this study, qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect the data through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. The results show that the two courses are different in curriculum types, credits and hours. Course A contains many language skills training courses, while course B students have more content based courses, and teachers leave them with a lot of reading material after class. Both courses are equipped with excellent teacher resources and are evaluated in a similar way. The students who adopt the two courses have good comprehensive quality, but the students who adopt course B have better knowledge level and language skills. The two courses also have their own advantages and disadvantages. Students and teachers generally agree that curriculum B is more suitable for the development of academic talents, while curriculum A helps students to consolidate the foundation of language skills. Based on the main findings, this study concludes that the program with more content based curriculum can train students' comprehensive quality and academic ability more effectively. The curriculum for English majors should be adapted to meet students' academic needs and improve their abilities. Finally, some suggestions are put forward for the future curriculum and reform.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H319.3
本文编号：2126003
[Abstract]:The implementation of the new syllabus and the development of the new national standard have led many studies to focus on the English major curriculum. Many scholars and experts have studied the English major curriculum, students' learning and future development. However, few studies have compared the two specific courses, and many research articles on the future development direction of English major curriculum are mostly summary articles. There were 129 participants in this study, including 120 students using different courses and 9 teachers who taught them at the same time. In this study, qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect the data through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. The results show that the two courses are different in curriculum types, credits and hours. Course A contains many language skills training courses, while course B students have more content based courses, and teachers leave them with a lot of reading material after class. Both courses are equipped with excellent teacher resources and are evaluated in a similar way. The students who adopt the two courses have good comprehensive quality, but the students who adopt course B have better knowledge level and language skills. The two courses also have their own advantages and disadvantages. Students and teachers generally agree that curriculum B is more suitable for the development of academic talents, while curriculum A helps students to consolidate the foundation of language skills. Based on the main findings, this study concludes that the program with more content based curriculum can train students' comprehensive quality and academic ability more effectively. The curriculum for English majors should be adapted to meet students' academic needs and improve their abilities. Finally, some suggestions are put forward for the future curriculum and reform.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H319.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙毅;;《高等学校商务英语专业本科教学质量国家标准》的地方性解读:国标与校标的对照[J];外语界;2016年02期
2 冯光武;;新一轮英语类专业教育改革:回顾与展望[J];外语界;2016年01期
3 彭青龙;;论《英语类专业本科教学质量国家标准》的特点及其与学校标准的关系[J];外语教学与研究;2016年01期
4 邵丽君;孙秋月;;中国文化课程融入英语专业教学的行动研究[J];中国教育学刊;2015年S1期
5 潘鸣威;冯光武;;质量是核心,评价是关键——论《高等学校英语专业本科教学质量国家标准》中的评价要求[J];中国外语;2015年05期
6 景婧;;英语专业体裁文本依托文学课程体系改革效果分析[J];外语界;2015年04期
7 朱金兰;;我国港台高校大学英语课程比较与启示[J];外语界;2015年04期
8 仲伟合;;《英语类专业本科教学质量国家标准》指导下的英语类专业创新发展[J];外语界;2015年03期
9 王立非;叶兴国;严明;彭青龙;许德金;;商务英语专业本科教学质量国家标准要点解读[J];外语教学与研究;2015年02期
10 仲伟合;潘鸣威;;论《英语专业本科教学质量国家标准》的制定——创新与思考[J];现代外语;2015年01期
，本文编号：2126003
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2126003.html
