中国EFL学习者英语概念加工中的模态转换效应实证研究
[Abstract]:A large number of studies have shown that in the process of perceptual processing, the conversion of different modes will lead to processing consumption. The theory of perceptual symbols holds that external things are stored in the brain in the form of multimodal perceptual symbols. According to the theory of perceptual symbols, perceptual simulation is the basis of conceptual representation, and the processing of different modes of concepts results in conversion consumption. On the other hand, previous studies on the conceptual processing of negative sentences have proved that negative information is represented by embodied patterns, but there is no evidence that perceptual simulation can affect the processing of negative information. The main research questions are: (1) Does modal transfer effect exist in the conceptual processing of Chinese EFL learners'English affirmative sentences? (2) Does modal transfer effect exist in the conceptual processing of Chinese EFL learners' English negative sentences? (2) Does it exist in the conceptual processing of Chinese EFL learners'English negative sentences? In this study, 20 postgraduates majoring in language and literature in Sichuan Foreign Language College were selected as subjects. The task paradigm of sentence judgment was used to make the subjects judge whether the concepts in the sentences were correctly described or not. EEG data were used to investigate whether there was modal switching effect in the conceptual processing of L2 Kennegatives. The experiment was programmed with E-Prime 2.0 software. Neuroscan 4.5 and Synaps 2 collected and recorded the EEG data produced in the experiment. Then the EEG data were analyzed offline and the results were input into SPSS19.0 statistical software for statistical analysis. The experimental results are as follows: (1) In the processing of English affirmative sentences, there is no significant difference between the response time (t = - 0.186, P = 0.8550.05) and the accuracy (t = 0.000, P = 1.0000.05) of the subjects under the condition of modal consistency and inconsistency. The results show that modal inconsistencies induce P200 (t = - 3.551, P = 0.0010.05) with larger amplitude and N400 (t = - 2.053, P = 0.0420.05) with longer latency than modal inconsistencies. This indicates that EFL learners in China need to pay more attention to second language conceptual processing on the basis of perceptual experience. In addition, this study also found that modal congruence induced a larger N100 amplitude (t = - 2.920, P = 0.0040.05) than modal inconsistency, indicating that different modal perceptual stimuli induced different ERP modulation effects. (2) In the processing of English negative sentences, behavioral data showed that subjects with modal congruence and inconsistency had different ERP modulation effects. There was no significant difference in response time (t = 1.308, P = 0.2090.05) of the target (3) sentence, but the accuracy of the subjects under modal inconsistency was significantly lower than that under modal consistency (t = 2.364, P = 0.0310.05), indicating that contextual sentences under different modal conditions interfered with the comprehension of the target sentence or the promotion of contextual sentences under consistent modal conditions. Similar to the conceptual processing in affirmative sentences, the EEG data showed that modal inconsistency induced larger P200 amplitude (t = - 4.026, P = 0.0000.05), longer latency (t = - 2.965, P = 0.0040.05) and smaller N100 amplitude (t = - 4.145, P = 0.0000.05) than modal congruence, indicating that No. The addition of definite factors does not affect the conceptual processing of English negative sentences by modal conditions. The effect of modal transformation also exists in the conceptual processing of English negative sentences by Chinese EFL learners. The learners perform perceptual simulation in the process of conceptual processing, and there are modal switching effects in the conceptual processing of English affirmative and negative sentences.
【学位授予单位】:四川外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H319.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许梦卿;;在EFL课堂里创造语境促进互动——评《新标准大学英语综合教程》[J];新乡学院学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
2 张冬贵;EFL学习者作文中的语篇错误分析与更正[J];黄冈师范学院学报;2002年04期
3 黄凤菊;;EFL课堂错误纠正的合适时机[J];中国校外教育(理论);2008年03期
4 文格;;EFL教学中的纠错问题——理论、研究现状与发展[J];南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
5 田小丽;万雅曼;胡文静;;浅析连贯与EFL写作教学[J];时代教育(教育教学版);2009年02期
6 沈育刚;二语词汇表征与EFL词汇教学[J];丽水师范专科学校学报;2002年01期
7 何静;语篇的宏观结构与EFL写作教学[J];贵州民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年04期
8 张新峰;郑志恋;;高中EFL教师课程发展策略的调查与分析[J];英语教师;2011年05期
9 张骏宇;;跨文化视角下成人EFL中英单词组织的互动[J];疯狂英语(教师版);2012年03期
10 史子明;康卉;;匿名约束式反馈对学生在EFL写作中反馈行为影响的实证研究[J];大连大学学报;2014年02期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 张新玲;;中国大学EFL学习者英汉/汉英笔译测试研究综述[A];第十四届全国科技翻译研讨会论文汇编[C];2011年
2 戴远君;;《中国EFL学习者常见英语错误词典》编纂的几点设想[A];中国辞书学会双语词典专业委员会第七届年会论文集[C];2007年
3 游晓晔;;构建一个生态性的EFL写作理论——从中国英语写作教学史谈起[A];英语写作教学与研究的中国视角——第四届中国英语写作教学与研究国际研讨会论文集[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王蕾;中国高水平EFL学习者语言研究:程式语和语言创造性[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 辛彦蓉;中国EFL学习者英汉语加工中“名词和代词”同指约束性的比较研究[D];四川外国语大学;2015年
2 甘沁;任务复杂度对EFL写作中句法复杂性的影响[D];西南交通大学;2014年
3 邵琴;“间接数据驱动”词汇学习在EFL课堂中的应用—一项准实验研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年
4 李馨;任务复杂度对EFL课堂生—生互动的影响研究[D];南京师范大学;2016年
5 曹颖;中国EFL学习者英、汉词语加工中的模态模拟[D];四川外国语大学;2016年
6 程丽娟;中国EFL学习者英语“And-并列句”加工中空缺动词的ERPs研究[D];四川外国语大学;2016年
7 侯阳;高中生的EFL学习风格[D];辽宁师范大学;2002年
8 佟英姿;大学生及英语教师的EFL学习风格[D];辽宁师范大学;2005年
9 王梅;EFL写作教学中的词汇短语研究[D];西南师范大学;2005年
10 彭飞;学生口头陈述在EFL课堂中作为支架策略的研究[D];湖南大学;2010年
,本文编号:2196280
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2196280.html