希拉里竞选演讲的积极话语分析
发布时间：2018-12-16 19:30
【摘要】：作为一个公众人物,希拉里在政治舞台上十分活跃,从律师、第一夫人、纽约州参议员,到美国国务卿,希拉里演讲风格一直被认为是枯燥无聊、冷峻犀利、强硬果断。和之前演讲相比,希拉里这次一改往日语言风格,2016年6月13日,希拉里在纽约罗斯福岛开始了首场重要的大型竞选集会,正式打响问鼎白宫的大选之战,这次演讲热情洋溢、幽默、极具个人色彩。尽管希拉里没有成为第一位女性总统,但是她成为美国历史上首位获得主要政党提名的女性总统候选人,并在普选中获得超过230,000的明显优势。本文运用评价理论从积极话语分析角度对希拉里竞选演讲语篇进行分析研究,随机选取2016年希拉里竞选演讲10篇。旨在通过考察语篇中的意义资源来揭示语篇的作者/发话者是如何构建其与读者/听众的社会角色关系,发现作者/发话者对周围世界什么样的态度评价,是如何表达的。基于此本文要回答两个研究问题:1、在希拉里的竞选演讲中都有哪些评价资源?2、在希拉里的竞选演讲中这些评价资源是如何分布的?本文以评价理论为基本框架,从态度、介入和级差三个系统入手,首先对文本进行识别和标注,对演讲当中的评价资源进行归类和统计,获得评价资源的分布,然后分析揭示各种评价资源的深层意义。研究结果表明,希拉里的竞选演讲中存在丰富的评价资源,且以正面肯定性评价为主,分别属于态度资源、介入资源和级差资源。三种评价资源分布不均,其中,态度资源居多,级差次之,介入最少,但级差和介入的差别不大。借助态度资源中的情感资源和判断资源,希拉里在情感和道德方面与大众达成一致立场。由此可见,希拉里主要是通过态度资源与听众建立和谐的人际关系。
[Abstract]:As a public figure, Hillary Clinton is very active in the political arena, from lawyers, first Lady, New York Senator to Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton speech style has been considered boring, cold sharp, tough and decisive. In contrast to her previous speech, Hillary Clinton's first major campaign rally in Roosevelt Island, New York, on June 13, 2016, officially kicked off a campaign battle for the White House, which was filled with enthusiasm. Humor, very personal color. Although Hillary Clinton did not become the first woman to become president, she became the first woman to be nominated by a major political party in U.S. history, gaining a clear majority of more than 230000 in the general election. This paper uses evaluation theory to analyze Hillary Clinton's campaign speeches from the perspective of positive discourse analysis, and randomly selects 10 Clinton speeches in 2016. The purpose of this paper is to reveal how the author / speaker of a text constructs its social role relationship with the reader / audience by examining the meaning resources in the text, and to find out how the author / speaker expresses his or her attitude towards the world around him. Based on this, this paper will answer two research questions: 1, what evaluation resources are there in Hillary Clinton's campaign speech? 2, how are these evaluation resources distributed in Hillary Clinton's campaign speech? Based on the basic framework of evaluation theory, this paper starts with three systems of attitude, intervention and differential. Firstly, the text is identified and annotated, the evaluation resources in speech are classified and counted, and the distribution of evaluation resources is obtained. Then the analysis reveals the deep meaning of various evaluation resources. The results show that there are abundant evaluation resources in Hillary Clinton's campaign speech, and positive evaluation is the main one, which belongs to attitude resources, intervention resources and differential resources respectively. The three kinds of evaluation resources are unevenly distributed, among which, attitude resources are the majority, the rank difference is the second, and the intervention is the least, but the difference between the difference and intervention is not significant. With emotional and judgment resources in her attitude resources, Hillary Clinton agreed with the public on emotional and moral issues. It can be seen that Hillary Clinton mainly through attitude resources and the audience to build a harmonious interpersonal relationship.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H315
本文编号：2382927
[Abstract]:As a public figure, Hillary Clinton is very active in the political arena, from lawyers, first Lady, New York Senator to Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton speech style has been considered boring, cold sharp, tough and decisive. In contrast to her previous speech, Hillary Clinton's first major campaign rally in Roosevelt Island, New York, on June 13, 2016, officially kicked off a campaign battle for the White House, which was filled with enthusiasm. Humor, very personal color. Although Hillary Clinton did not become the first woman to become president, she became the first woman to be nominated by a major political party in U.S. history, gaining a clear majority of more than 230000 in the general election. This paper uses evaluation theory to analyze Hillary Clinton's campaign speeches from the perspective of positive discourse analysis, and randomly selects 10 Clinton speeches in 2016. The purpose of this paper is to reveal how the author / speaker of a text constructs its social role relationship with the reader / audience by examining the meaning resources in the text, and to find out how the author / speaker expresses his or her attitude towards the world around him. Based on this, this paper will answer two research questions: 1, what evaluation resources are there in Hillary Clinton's campaign speech? 2, how are these evaluation resources distributed in Hillary Clinton's campaign speech? Based on the basic framework of evaluation theory, this paper starts with three systems of attitude, intervention and differential. Firstly, the text is identified and annotated, the evaluation resources in speech are classified and counted, and the distribution of evaluation resources is obtained. Then the analysis reveals the deep meaning of various evaluation resources. The results show that there are abundant evaluation resources in Hillary Clinton's campaign speech, and positive evaluation is the main one, which belongs to attitude resources, intervention resources and differential resources respectively. The three kinds of evaluation resources are unevenly distributed, among which, attitude resources are the majority, the rank difference is the second, and the intervention is the least, but the difference between the difference and intervention is not significant. With emotional and judgment resources in her attitude resources, Hillary Clinton agreed with the public on emotional and moral issues. It can be seen that Hillary Clinton mainly through attitude resources and the audience to build a harmonious interpersonal relationship.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H315
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 房红梅;;论评价理论对系统功能语言学的发展[J];现代外语;2014年03期
2 胡壮麟;;积极话语分析和批评话语分析的互补性[J];当代外语研究;2012年07期
3 刘世铸;;评价理论在中国的发展[J];外语与外语教学;2010年05期
4 胡社考;程洪梅;车振冬;;就职演讲语篇建构的评价视角[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年04期
5 王振华;路洋;;“介入系统”嬗变[J];外语学刊;2010年03期
6 姜雪;刘薇;;从语言的元功能看政治演讲——以奥巴马2008年大选获胜演说为例[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
7 朱永生;;概念意义中的隐性评价[J];外语教学;2009年04期
8 丁爱兰;;浅谈积极话语分析的产生、发展及其研究状况[J];绥化学院学报;2009年03期
9 严世清;赵霞;;政治语篇中的情态表达及其批评性话语分析[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年02期
10 袁华;;美国对伊态度的新变化——对伊朗核问题报道的积极话语分析[J];华东交通大学学报;2009年01期
，本文编号：2382927
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2382927.html
