语言元功能和社会文化视角下的2016年美国总统竞选辩论研究
发布时间：2023-12-28 19:31
2016年美国总统大选是近年来争夺最激烈、火药味最浓、政治分化最严重的一次大选。被美国政界和主流媒体视为“圈外人”和“语出惊人”的特朗普在大选前并不被媒体和民意测验看好。特朗普因其大胆言论甚至被主流媒体塑造为“蠢蛋”、“疯子”形象。但特朗普却最终以304张选举人团票成功逆袭,当选美国第45任总统。大选结果令人意想不到。大选最后的那三场总统电视辩论非常值得关注。电视辩论在美国总统大选中起着至关重要的作用,是美国总统选举结果的一个重要风向标,也是候选人能否获胜的关键环节。普选中一直领先的希拉里却未能通过最后三场电视辩论锁定胜局,最终惜败于政界新客特朗普,这样的结果引人深思。人类语言是人类社会和文化中的语言,它与人类社会文化有着密切的关系。语言和社会文化是相互依存的,但同时也相互影响。语言是社会文化的载体,是人们相互交流的工具,社会文化反过来又对语言产生制约作用。“语不惊人死不休”的特朗普是如何赢得选举的?他的当选是偶然的成功,还是有更深入的原因?本文拟从语言元功能和社会文化视角来探析唐纳德·特朗普胜选的主客观原因。这也是本文的一种尝试和创新之处。首先,本文在韩礼德的元功能理论指导下,以20...
【文章页数】：65 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Purpose and Significance
1.3 Research Objective
1.4 Data and Methodology
1.5 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Studies of U.S.Presidential Election Debates Abroad
2.2 Studies of U.S.Presidential Election Debates At Home
2.3 Comments on Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 A Brief Introduction to SFL
3.2 Three Meta-Functions in SFL
3.2.1 Ideational Function
3.2.2 Interpersonal Function
3.2.2.1 Mood
3.2.2.2 Modality
3.2.3 Textual Function
Chapter Four Analyses of the Presidential Debates
4.1 Analysis of Ideational Function
4.1.1 Material Process
4.1.2 Mental Process
4.1.3 Relational Process
4.2 Analysis of Interpersonal Function
4.2.1 Analysis of Mood System
4.2.1.1 Declarative Sentence
4.2.1.2 Interrogative Sentences
4.2.1.3 Imperative Sentence
4.2.2 Analysis of the Modality System in the Third Debate
4.2.3 Analysis of Pronoun System in the Third Debate
4.3 Analysis of Textual Function
4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Analyses of Sociocultural Reasons
5.1 Analysis of Voters and Their Demands
5.1.1 The Classification of Voters
5.1.2 The Polarization Between the Rich And the Poor
5.1.3 The Demands for Defying"Political Correctness"And"Elite Class"
5.2 A Clash of American Values
5.2.1 Conservatism V.S.Multiculturalism
5.2.2“We Are Great”V.S. “Make America Great Again”
5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Discussion and Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
6.2 Implications
6.3 Contributions and Limitations
References
攻读学位期间的研究成果
本文编号：3876047
【文章页数】：65 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Purpose and Significance
1.3 Research Objective
1.4 Data and Methodology
1.5 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Studies of U.S.Presidential Election Debates Abroad
2.2 Studies of U.S.Presidential Election Debates At Home
2.3 Comments on Previous Studies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 A Brief Introduction to SFL
3.2 Three Meta-Functions in SFL
3.2.1 Ideational Function
3.2.2 Interpersonal Function
3.2.2.1 Mood
3.2.2.2 Modality
3.2.3 Textual Function
Chapter Four Analyses of the Presidential Debates
4.1 Analysis of Ideational Function
4.1.1 Material Process
4.1.2 Mental Process
4.1.3 Relational Process
4.2 Analysis of Interpersonal Function
4.2.1 Analysis of Mood System
4.2.1.1 Declarative Sentence
4.2.1.2 Interrogative Sentences
4.2.1.3 Imperative Sentence
4.2.2 Analysis of the Modality System in the Third Debate
4.2.3 Analysis of Pronoun System in the Third Debate
4.3 Analysis of Textual Function
4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Analyses of Sociocultural Reasons
5.1 Analysis of Voters and Their Demands
5.1.1 The Classification of Voters
5.1.2 The Polarization Between the Rich And the Poor
5.1.3 The Demands for Defying"Political Correctness"And"Elite Class"
5.2 A Clash of American Values
5.2.1 Conservatism V.S.Multiculturalism
5.2.2“We Are Great”V.S. “Make America Great Again”
5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Discussion and Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
6.2 Implications
6.3 Contributions and Limitations
References
攻读学位期间的研究成果
本文编号：3876047
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/3876047.html
